ConnecticutSouthbury

Pomperaug Woods Health Center

80 Heritage Rd, Southbury, CT 06488 · Naugatuck Vly County · 37 certified beds · avg 31 residents/day · certified since May 18, 1988

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$20,872
Fines, last 3 years
5.99
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Oct 16, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Nov 22, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Sep 18, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Oct 24, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (20)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 20, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
May 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Jan 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Oct 16, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Oct 16, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 16, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Oct 16, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 16, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Oct 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Oct 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Oct 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Sep 18, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Sep 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Sep 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Apr 18, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have enough support staff to safely and effectively run its food and nutrition service.
Apr 18, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 18, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Apr 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Apr 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Apr 18, 2023B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 8).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202360F
2024112G ▲
202520D
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $20,872.

DateTypeAmount / length
Sep 18, 2024Fine$8,018
Sep 18, 2024Fine$12,854

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityConnecticut avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.993.803.95top 2% in Connecticut; top 4% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.540.700.69top 5% in Connecticut; top 4% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing5.303.433.50top 2% in Connecticut; top 4% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)1.030.460.48top 5% in Connecticut; top 5% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)45.137.445.8bottom 20% in Connecticut; bottom 50% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)27.338.642.9top 28% in Connecticut; top 24% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.26, RN 1.35, weekend 4.65. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Connery, JaneIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2012
Connery, JaneIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/25/2021
Edelson, ChristineIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2022
Gyba, VickiIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/24/2024
Gyba, VickiIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/20/2025
Jedlinsky, HelenaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE12/10/2019
Lukos, GregIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2024
Lukos, GregIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2024
Mihalcik, MatthewIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2018
Mihalcik, MatthewIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Monahan, PatrickIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Newtown Savings BankOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2020
Newtown Savings BankOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2020
Raad, MarcIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Raad, MarcIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/31/2025
Schwarzchild, KarenIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2024
Vas, AntonioIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2021
Wnuck, MaryIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE02/07/2017
Wnuck, MaryIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/25/2021

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Lutheran Home of Southbury INC1.4 miSouthbury, CT★★★☆☆3/5
River Glen Health Care Center2.0 miSouthbury, CT★★★★★4/5
Complete Care at Middlebury6.6 miMiddlebury, CT★★★★★5/5
Stone Bridge Center for Health & Rehabilitation7.7 miNewtown, CT★★★★☆3/5
Apple Rehab Watertown9.0 miWatertown, CT★★★★☆4/5
Waterbury Center for Nursing & Rehabilitation LLC9.7 miWaterbury, CT★★★★★4/5
Complete Care at Glendale9.9 miNaugatuck, CT★★★★☆3/5
Bethel Health Care Center10.1 miBethel, CT★★★★☆4/5
Beacon Brook Center for Health & Rehabilitation10.1 miNaugatuck, CT★★☆☆☆2/5
Shady Knoll Center for Health & Rehabilitation10.6 miSeymour, CT★★☆☆☆2/5
Village Crest Center for Health & Rehabilitation11.6 miNew Milford, CT★★★★☆3/5
Candlewood Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center11.8 miNew Milford, CT★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Southbury →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 075318.