How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Celina Manor
1001 Myers Road, Celina, OH 45822 (opens Google Maps) · Mercer County · (419) 586-6645· 75 certified beds · avg 72 residents/day · certified since Jun 26, 1978 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: HCF MANAGEMENT (22 facilities, chain avg rating 3.1★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Mar 30, 2026
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.64
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 19 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. F-0582
The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. F-0585
The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). F-0628
View all 19 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Mar 30, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · F-0585 |
| Mar 30, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · F-0628 |
| Mar 30, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Mar 30, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · from a complaint · F-0698 |
| Mar 30, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| Mar 30, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Mar 30, 2026 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months. · F-0868 |
| May 10, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| May 10, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| May 10, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| May 10, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| May 10, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide or obtain laboratory tests when a doctor ordered them, or did not promptly report the results back to the doctor who ordered them. · F-0773 |
| May 10, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Dec 19, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Dec 19, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Dec 19, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625 |
| Dec 19, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Dec 19, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 8).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2019
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 5 | 0 | D |
| 2023 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 8 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityOhio averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.64
Ohio average: 3.45
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.79
Ohio average: 0.60
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.09
Ohio average: 3.07
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Ohio avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.64 | 3.45 | 3.95 | top 29% in Ohio; bottom 43% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.79 | 0.60 | 0.69 | top 15% in Ohio; top 28% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.09 | 3.07 | 3.50 | top 38% in Ohio; bottom 36% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.44 | 0.42 | 0.48 | top 35% in Ohio; top 41% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 47.9 | 48.7 | 45.8 | top 48% in Ohio; bottom 42% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 33.3 | 43.9 | 42.9 | top 31% in Ohio; top 33% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.51, RN 0.77, weekend 2.98.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.51 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Celina Manor. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joann C. Unverferth 11-29-04 Revocable Trust Fbo Kendra M. Unverferth | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 6% | 05/01/2025 |
| Joann C. Unverferth 11-29-04 Revocable Trust Fbo Kevan R. Unverferth | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 6% | 05/01/2025 |
| Joann C. Unverferth 12-29-04 Revocable Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 7% | 05/01/2025 |
| Joann C. Unverferth 12-31-12 Irrevocable Grantor Trust Fbo Kendra M. U | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 9% | 05/01/2025 |
| Joann C. Unverferth 12-31-12 Irrevocable Grantor Trust Fbo Kerri A. Ro | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 9% | 05/01/2025 |
| Joann C. Unverferth 12-31-12 Irrevocable Grantor Trust Fbo Kevan R. Un | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 9% | 05/01/2025 |
| Joann C. Unverferth 12-31-12 Irrevocable Grantor Trust Fbo Kristen S. | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 9% | 05/01/2025 |
| Joann C. Unverferth 12-31-12 Irrevocable Grantor Trust Fbo Kyle J. Unv | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 9% | 05/01/2025 |
| Kerri A. Romes 11-28-18 Business Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 6% | 05/01/2025 |
| Kristen S. Stechschulte 02-21-20 Business Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 6% | 05/01/2025 |
| Kyle J. Unverferth 02-21-20 Business Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 6% | 05/01/2025 |
| HCF Management, INC. | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
| Hunter, Rachel | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2022 |
| Hunter, Rachel | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2022 |
| Klay, Celeste | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Klay, Celeste | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Klay, Celeste | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Klay, Celeste | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Romes, Kerri | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/29/2019 |
| Romes, Kerri | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2019 |
Showing 20 of 31 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 11 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain HCF Management — 22 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Court House Manor — Washington Court Hou, OH · overall 4/5
- Fox Run Manor — Findlay, OH · overall 3/5
- Manor at Perrysburg — Perrysburg, OH · overall 2/5
- Piqua Manor — Piqua, OH · overall 3/5
- Roselawn Manor — Spencerville, OH · overall 5/5
- Shawnee Manor — Lima, OH · overall 4/5
- St Catherine's C C of Fostoria — Fostoria, OH · overall 3/5
- St Catherines Manor of Washington Court House — Washington Court Hou, OH · overall 4/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 21 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Before any service that isn't covered by Medicare or Medicaid, how will you notify us and get our agreement?"
- "Walk me through what happens when a resident or family files a grievance — who responds and how fast?"
- "What written notices do we get before any transfer or discharge, and what is your bed-hold policy?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How do you coordinate and monitor care for residents who receive dialysis?"
- "How often is each resident's medication list reviewed, and who decides when a drug can be reduced or stopped?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "How does your quality committee work, and can you share an example of a problem it identified and fixed?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 48% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 31 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gardens at Celina | 0.3 mi | Celina, OH | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Briarwood Village | 7.5 mi | Coldwater, OH | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Otterbein St Marys Retirement Community | 7.7 mi | St Marys, OH | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Grande Lake Healthcare Center | 8.2 mi | St Marys, OH | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Vancrest of St Mary's | 9.7 mi | St Marys, OH | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Colonial Nursing Center of Rockford | 9.8 mi | Rockford, OH | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Transitional Care Unit | 9.9 mi | Saint Marys, OH | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Divine Rehabilitation and Nursing at Shane Hill | 10.6 mi | Rockford, OH | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Gardens at St Henry the | 10.8 mi | Saint Henry, OH | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Roselawn Manor | 14.9 mi | Spencerville, OH | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Carecore at Minster | 15.1 mi | Minster, OH | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Wapakoneta Manor | 18.7 mi | Wapakoneta, OH | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 365377.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).