How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Cedar Ridge Village
8950 Coachlight Drive, West Des Moines, IA 50266 (opens Google Maps) · Dallas County · (515) 369-2100· 40 certified beds · avg 39 residents/day · certified since Aug 30, 2021 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: PIVOTAL HEALTH CARE (9 facilities, chain avg rating 3.9★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Aug 12, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.97
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 20 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. F-0582
The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. F-0605
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. F-0656
View all 20 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Aug 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. · F-0605 |
| Aug 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Aug 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Aug 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Aug 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Aug 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Aug 1, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Aug 1, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803 |
| Dec 11, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Dec 11, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility hired someone with an official finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft against them. Facilities are not allowed to employ people with such findings. · F-0606 |
| Dec 11, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Dec 11, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Dec 11, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Dec 11, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Dec 11, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months. · F-0868 |
| Dec 11, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Dec 11, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program. · F-0882 |
| Aug 7, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Aug 7, 2023 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months. · from a complaint · F-0868 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 7).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 11
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 7
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 11 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 2 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 7 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityIowa averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 4.97
Iowa average: 4.37
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 1.58
Iowa average: 0.85
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 4.22
Iowa average: 3.86
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Iowa avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.97 | 4.37 | 3.95 | top 19% in Iowa; top 14% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.58 | 0.85 | 0.69 | top 3% in Iowa; top 4% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.22 | 3.86 | 3.50 | top 29% in Iowa; top 17% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.90 | 0.51 | 0.48 | top 7% in Iowa; top 8% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 56.5 | 44.0 | 45.8 | bottom 17% in Iowa; bottom 22% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 50.0 | 42.1 | 42.9 | bottom 41% in Iowa; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.13, RN 1.31, weekend 3.50.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.13 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Cedar Ridge Village. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anderson, Jordan | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2025 |
| Anderson, Marlene | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| Anderson, Wayne | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| Cadet Investment LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| Cadet Investment LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| Central Iowa Hospital Corporation | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| Gulledge, Scott | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| Gulledge, Travis | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2021 |
| Howard, Steven | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| Poky - 5r LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| Scenic Development LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| Wood, Gilbert | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| WSG LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| WSG LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| Anderson, Jordan | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Dehaven, Katherine | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/16/2024 |
| Dehaven, Katherine | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/16/2024 |
| Gulledge, Scott | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2024 |
| Gulledge, Scott | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| Gulledge, Travis | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
Showing 20 of 30 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 10 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Pivotal Health Care — 9 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Kennybrook Village — Grimes, IA · overall 3/5
- Northridge Village — Ames, IA · overall 5/5
- Prairie Vista Village — Altoona, IA · overall 5/5
- Terrace Glen Village — Marion, IA · overall 5/5
- Colonial Village — Overland Park, KS · overall 2/5
- Westchester Village of Lenexa — Lenexa, KS · overall 4/5
- Linden Woods Village — Gladstone, MO · overall 4/5
- Raintree Village — Lees Summit, MO · overall —/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Before any service that isn't covered by Medicare or Medicaid, how will you notify us and get our agreement?"
- "What percentage of your residents are on antipsychotic or sedating medications, and how do you work to reduce that?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 57% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 30 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 41 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edgewater, a Wesleylife Community | 0.7 mi | West Des Moines, IA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Arbor Springs of West Des Moines L L C | 0.7 mi | West Des Moines, IA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Harmony West Des Moines | 3.3 mi | West Des Moines, IA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Deerfield Health Care Center | 3.7 mi | Urbandale, IA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Walnut Ridge | 4.1 mi | Clive, IA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Pine Acres Rehabilitation and Care Center | 5.7 mi | West Des Moines, IA | —/5 | abuseSFF | |
| Karen Acres Care Center | 6.9 mi | Urbandale, IA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Royal Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 7.4 mi | Urbandale, IA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Iowa Jewish Senior Life Center | 7.7 mi | Des Moines, IA | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Wesley on Grand | 8.5 mi | Des Moines, IA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Calvin Community | 8.5 mi | Des Moines, IA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Kennybrook Village | 8.7 mi | Grimes, IA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Dallas, IA — 8 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Granger Nursing & Rehabilitation Center — Granger, IA · overall 3/5
- Perry Lutheran Home — Perry, IA · overall 1/5
- Perry Lutheran Homes Eden Acres Campus — Perry, IA · overall 2/5abuse
- Spurgeon Manor — Dallas Center, IA · overall 5/5
- Adel Acres — Adel, IA · overall 1/5SFF
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 165790.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).