How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
2001 Kennedy Street, Granger, IA 50109 (opens Google Maps) · Dallas County · (515) 999-2588· 67 certified beds · avg 50 residents/day · certified since Mar 1, 1994 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: CAMPBELL STREET SERVICES (22 facilities, chain avg rating 2.1★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 24 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. F-0688
The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint F-0755
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. F-0761
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Feb 26, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755 |
| Feb 26, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Feb 26, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service. · F-0801 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Feb 15, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Feb 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint · F-0550 |
| Feb 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Feb 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Feb 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · F-0607 |
| Feb 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Feb 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. · F-0637 |
| Feb 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| Feb 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Feb 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Feb 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Feb 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Feb 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 4).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 7 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 4 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Iowa avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.68 | 4.37 | 3.95 | bottom 17% in Iowa; bottom 46% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.60 | 0.85 | 0.69 | bottom 22% in Iowa; top 48% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.30 | 3.86 | 3.50 | bottom 24% in Iowa; bottom 47% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.29 | 0.51 | 0.48 | bottom 15% in Iowa; bottom 30% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 97.2 | 44.0 | 45.8 | bottom 2% in Iowa; bottom 1% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 80.0 | 42.1 | 42.9 | bottom 7% in Iowa; bottom 6% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.17, RN 0.51, weekend 2.84.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.17 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Granger Nursing & Rehabilitation Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chitai Investment, LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2020 |
| Curcio, Dominic | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2020 |
| Holdco Goldfinch, LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2020 |
| Holdco Tabletop, LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2020 |
| Investco Tabletop, LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2020 |
| Techcare Corp | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2020 |
| Campbell Street Services LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2020 |
| Campbell Street Services LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/20/2025 |
| Chitai Investment, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2020 |
| Conner, Robert | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2024 |
| Conner, Robert | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2024 |
| Curcio, Dominic | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2020 |
| Dole, Isaac | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2020 |
| Dole, Isaac | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2020 |
| Dunlap, Jason | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/02/2024 |
| Dunlap, Jason | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/02/2024 |
| Holdco Goldfinch, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2020 |
| Holdco Tabletop, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2020 |
| Investco Tabletop, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2020 |
| Managerco Goldfinch, LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2020 |
Showing 20 of 25 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 5 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Campbell Street Services — 22 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 21 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kennybrook Village | 5.2 mi | Grimes, IA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| On with Life Long Term Care | 5.5 mi | Polk City, IA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Brio of Johnston, LLC | 6.8 mi | Johnston, IA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Madrid Home for the Aged | 8.0 mi | Madrid, IA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Spurgeon Manor | 8.7 mi | Dallas Center, IA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Bishop Drumm Retirement Center | 9.2 mi | Johnston, IA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Royal Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 9.5 mi | Urbandale, IA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Childserve Habilitation Center | 9.6 mi | Johnston, IA | ★★★★★ | 3/5 | |
| Deerfield Health Care Center | 10.2 mi | Urbandale, IA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Karen Acres Care Center | 10.7 mi | Urbandale, IA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Sunny View Care Center | 11.0 mi | Ankeny, IA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Bridges at Ankeny | 11.0 mi | Ankeny, IA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Dallas, IA — 8 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 165208.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details