How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
11546 Florida Blvd, Baton Rouge, LA 70815 (opens Google Maps) · E. Baton Rouge County · (225) 275-0474· 132 certified beds · avg 98 residents/day · certified since May 1, 1999 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: THE CARPENTER HEALTH NETWORK (4 facilities, chain avg rating 2.5★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 25 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · from a complaint F-0628
The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. F-0640
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jun 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · from a complaint · F-0628 |
| Jun 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| Jun 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Jun 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint · F-0686 |
| Jun 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · F-0694 |
| Jun 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Jun 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life. · F-0849 |
| Jun 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Dec 26, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Jun 13, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jun 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint · F-0550 |
| Jun 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Jun 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| Jun 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Jun 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Jul 27, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not give residents reasonable access to and privacy in using ways to communicate, such as phones, mail, and email. Residents have the right to stay in touch with the outside world privately. · F-0576 |
| Jul 27, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jul 27, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
| Jul 27, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580 |
| Jul 27, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Jul 27, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Jul 27, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jul 27, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Jul 27, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 9).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 9 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 7 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 9 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Louisiana avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.97 | 4.04 | 3.95 | bottom 8% in Louisiana; bottom 13% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.07 | 0.32 | 0.69 | bottom 1% in Louisiana; bottom 1% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.72 | 3.45 | 3.50 | bottom 13% in Louisiana; bottom 17% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.09 | 0.20 | 0.48 | bottom 13% in Louisiana; bottom 1% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 67.2 | 47.6 | 45.8 | bottom 8% in Louisiana; bottom 8% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | — | 41.6 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.91, RN 0.09, weekend 3.57.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.91 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Capitol House Nursing and Rehab Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jcap Management LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2017 |
| Mitchell, Patrick | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2019 |
| PCM Holdings I, INC. | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 92% | 07/18/2025 |
| PCM Intermediate Holdings LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/18/2025 |
| PCM Rehab Enterprises LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 92% | 07/18/2025 |
| PTM 2018 Family Trust | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/18/2025 |
| Zuelke, Annette | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2009 |
| Zuelke, Annette | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2009 |
| Gator 25 LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/30/2025 |
| Holleman, Emily | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/12/2025 |
| Mitchell, Kelly | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/12/2025 |
| Mitchell, Patrick | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/10/2004 |
| Montgomery, Latereca | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/04/2021 |
| Montgomery, Latereca | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/04/2021 |
| Nnadi, John | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2024 |
| Nnadi, John | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2024 |
| St. Joseph Holdings LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/10/2026 |
All 17 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain The Carpenter Health Network — 4 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Guest House Care Center | 0.9 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Flannery Oaks Guest House | 1.3 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Woodleigh of Baton Rouge | 1.8 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Pines Retirement Center of Baton Rouge | 2.0 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| White Oak Post Acute Care | 2.3 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | —/5 | SFF | |
| Landmark of Baton Rouge | 3.1 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Heritage Manor of Baton Rouge II | 3.1 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| St Clare Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation | 3.3 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Jefferson Manor Nursing and Rehab Ctr, LLC | 3.5 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Ollie Steele Burden Manor | 4.5 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Center Point Health Care and Rehab | 4.9 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Baton Rouge General Medical Center, SNF | 5.2 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in E. Baton Rouge, LA — 24 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 195476.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details