How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Brockton Post Acute Care
50 Christy Place, Brockton, MA 02301 (opens Google Maps) · Plymouth County · (508) 580-6800· 169 certified beds · avg 157 residents/day · certified since Dec 28, 1995 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES (87 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Apr 16, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.13
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 33 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint F-0658
The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. F-0676
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. F-0689
View all 33 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint · F-0658 |
| Apr 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · F-0676 |
| Apr 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Apr 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from. · F-0699 |
| Apr 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Apr 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804 |
| Apr 16, 2025 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Aug 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences. · from a complaint · F-0553 |
| Aug 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to share a room with their spouse or a roommate of their choosing, or moved residents to a different room without written notice beforehand. · from a complaint · F-0559 |
| Aug 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Feb 21, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583 |
| Feb 21, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Feb 21, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Feb 21, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804 |
| Feb 21, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Feb 21, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · F-0552 |
| Feb 21, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| Feb 21, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Feb 21, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Feb 21, 2024 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. · F-0637 |
| Feb 21, 2024 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition. · F-0638 |
| Feb 21, 2024 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| Feb 21, 2024 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| May 17, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| May 17, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council. · F-0565 |
| May 17, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| May 17, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| May 17, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| May 17, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| May 17, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636 |
| May 17, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · F-0694 |
| May 17, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| May 17, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. · F-0908 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (13 → 6).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2022
All citations: 10
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 16
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 7
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 10 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 16 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 7 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityMassachusetts averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.13
Massachusetts average: 3.89
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.52
Massachusetts average: 0.65
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.81
Massachusetts average: 3.51
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Massachusetts avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.13 | 3.89 | 3.95 | bottom 12% in Massachusetts; bottom 19% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.52 | 0.65 | 0.69 | bottom 37% in Massachusetts; bottom 41% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.81 | 3.51 | 3.50 | bottom 12% in Massachusetts; bottom 21% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.39 | 0.46 | 0.48 | bottom 44% in Massachusetts; top 50% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 37.5 | 38.2 | 45.8 | top 50% in Massachusetts; top 30% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 45.5 | 42.6 | 42.9 | bottom 42% in Massachusetts; bottom 43% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.47, RN 0.58, weekend 3.11.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.47 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Brockton Post Acute Care. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NFR 2020 Irrv Tr | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2025 |
| Quinto Nexgen LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2025 |
| Rsbrmk Holdings LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2025 |
| SK Nexgen Tr | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2025 |
| Skilled Venture LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2025 |
| Tryko Nexgen Holdings LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2025 |
| Uak 2020 Irrv Tr | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2025 |
| Ukr Nexgen LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2025 |
| Yk Nexgen Tr | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2025 |
| Yr Nexgen Tr | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2025 |
| Brockton Property LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2025 |
| Cohen, David | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2025 |
| Cohen, David | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2025 |
| Flagler, Osher | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/20/2025 |
| Kahanow, Aviva | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/07/2025 |
| Levovitz, Tzvi | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/20/2025 |
| Marios, Paul | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/10/2025 |
| Marios, Paul | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/10/2025 |
| Marios, Paul | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/10/2025 |
| Marquis Limited LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2025 |
Showing 20 of 41 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 21 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Marquis Health Services — 87 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Cape Cod Post Acute Care — Brewster, MA · overall 1/5
- Cedar View Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Methuen, MA · overall 5/5
- Chestnut Woods Rehabilitation and Healthcare Ctr — Saugus, MA · overall 4/5
- Hampden Post Acute — Wilbraham, MA · overall 3/5
- Highland Park Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Chelsea, MA · overall 1/5
- Lighthouse Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Revere, MA · overall 2/5
- Mill Brook Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Fall River, MA · overall 4/5
- Mont Marie Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center — Holyoke, MA · overall 4/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 86 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
- "How do you help residents maintain their daily living skills, and how do you measure whether it's working?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How do you learn about each resident's background and history, and how does that shape their care?"
- "How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
- "Could I join residents for a meal to see the food quality and temperature for myself?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "How are residents and families included in care plan meetings, and how often do those meetings happen?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Massachusetts midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 38% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 41 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 83 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alliance Health at West Acres | 0.7 mi | Brockton, MA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| The Guardian Center | 1.3 mi | Brockton, MA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Center at Blue Hills | 2.1 mi | Stoughton, MA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| St Joseph Manor Health Care INC | 2.5 mi | Brockton, MA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Champion Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 2.7 mi | Brockton, MA | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Copley at Stoughton Nursing Care Center | 3.0 mi | Stoughton, MA | ★★★★★ | 3/5 | |
| Southeast Rehabilitation & Skilled Care Center | 4.5 mi | North Easton, MA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Colony Center for Health and Rehabilitation | 4.6 mi | Abington, MA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Care One at Randolph | 4.9 mi | Randolph, MA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Life Care Center of West Bridgewater | 5.5 mi | West Bridgewater, MA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Sachem Center for Health and Rehabilitation | 5.8 mi | East Bridgewater, MA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Dwyer Home | 6.7 mi | Weymouth, MA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Plymouth, MA — 27 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Cardigan Nursing & Rehabilitation Center — Scituate, MA · overall 4/5
- Hannah B G Shaw Home — Middleboro, MA · overall 4/5
- Harbor House Nursing & Rehabilitation Center — Hingham, MA · overall 4/5
- Life Care Center of Plymouth — Plymouth, MA · overall 5/5
- Life Care Center of the South Shore — Scituate, MA · overall 5/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 225690.