MassachusettsBrockton

St Joseph Manor Health Care INC

215 Thatcher Street, Brockton, MA 02302 · Plymouth County · 118 certified beds · avg 104 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 1990

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.25
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (15)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 11, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Dec 11, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 11, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Dec 11, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Nov 6, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 6, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Aug 4, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Aug 4, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Aug 4, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Aug 4, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Aug 4, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Aug 4, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Aug 4, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Aug 4, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202380E
202430F
202540E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMassachusetts avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.253.893.95top 23% in Massachusetts; top 31% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.730.650.69top 27% in Massachusetts; top 34% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.843.513.50top 24% in Massachusetts; top 28% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.460.460.48top 36% in Massachusetts; top 38% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)26.038.245.8top 15% in Massachusetts; top 8% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)23.542.642.9top 16% in Massachusetts; top 19% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.64, RN 0.62, weekend 3.30. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Arenburg, PaulIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2014
Cardoso-Fontes, AngelaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/27/2014
Castillo, NicoleIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE05/18/2018
Castillo, NicoleIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/18/2018
Crowley, RichardIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/27/2013
Dauginikas, RuthIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2013
Keane, JamesIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/03/2016
Poor Sisters of Jesus Crucified and the Sorrowful Mother, INCOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE09/27/2013
Valliere, MaryIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/27/2013

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Champion Rehabilitation and Nursing Center0.8 miBrockton, MA★★☆☆☆3/5
Brockton Post Acute Care2.5 miBrockton, MA★★★★☆3/5
The Guardian Center2.8 miBrockton, MA★☆☆☆☆2/5
Colony Center for Health and Rehabilitation2.9 miAbington, MA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Alliance Health at West Acres3.1 miBrockton, MA★★★★☆4/5
Sachem Center for Health and Rehabilitation3.5 miEast Bridgewater, MA★★★☆☆3/5
The Center at Blue Hills4.6 miStoughton, MA★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Life Care Center of West Bridgewater5.3 miWest Bridgewater, MA★★★★★5/5
Southshore Health Care Center5.5 miRockland, MA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Copley at Stoughton Nursing Care Center5.5 miStoughton, MA★★★★★3/5
Webster Park Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center5.8 miRockland, MA★★★★★4/5
Dwyer Home6.3 miWeymouth, MA★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Brockton →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 225414.