MassachusettsRevere

Lighthouse Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center

204 Proctor Avenue, Revere, MA 02151 · Suffolk County · 123 certified beds · avg 116 residents/day · certified since May 14, 1987

Part of chain: MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES (87 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$48,790
Fines, last 3 years
3.38
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 20, 2026 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 24, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (38)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 20, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Feb 20, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Feb 20, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Feb 20, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Feb 20, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them.
Feb 20, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Feb 14, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records.
Feb 14, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Feb 14, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Feb 14, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 14, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 14, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention.
Feb 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Feb 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Feb 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment.
Feb 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Feb 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Feb 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Feb 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offWhen a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care.
Feb 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Feb 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids.
Feb 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Feb 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Feb 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Feb 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Feb 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Feb 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Feb 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Feb 14, 2025B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not follow the rules about disclosing who owns it, or did not tell the state agency about changes in ownership or key administrative staff.
Feb 20, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Feb 20, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 20, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council.
Feb 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Feb 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Feb 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids.
Feb 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Feb 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (23 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202490E
2025230F
202661G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $48,790.

DateTypeAmount / length
Feb 20, 2026Fine$48,790

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMassachusetts avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.383.893.95bottom 24% in Massachusetts; bottom 31% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.030.650.69top 7% in Massachusetts; top 15% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.023.513.50bottom 23% in Massachusetts; bottom 32% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.770.460.48top 9% in Massachusetts; top 13% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)26.538.245.8top 16% in Massachusetts; top 9% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)40.742.642.9top 49% in Massachusetts; top 49% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.70, RN 1.12, weekend 3.30. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Doyle, StephenIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Doyle, StephenIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Doyle, StephenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Doyle, StephenIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Flagler, OsherIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2025
Harman, DinaIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Harman, DinaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Healthcare Services Group INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/23/2025
Healthcare Services Group INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/23/2025
Kahanow, AvivaIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2025
Levovitz, TzviIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2025
Marquis Limited LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Marquis Limited LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/04/2025
NFR 2020 Irrv TrOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Nisar, SairaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Nisar, SairaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Popular BankOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Posen, MindeeIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Posen, MindeeIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024
Quinto Nexgen LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Rehabilitation & Nursing Center at Everett (the)0.9 miEverett, MA★★★☆☆4/5
The Massachusetts Veterans Home at Chelsea1.1 miChelsea, MA★★★★☆4/5
Katzman Family Center for Living1.2 miChelsea, MA★★★★★5/5
The Center at Advocate1.8 miEast Boston, MA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Highland Park Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center1.9 miChelsea, MA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Leonard Florence Center for Living2.1 miChelsea, MA★★★★★5/5
Dexter House Healthcare2.5 miMalden, MA★★★☆☆3/5
Saugus Center2.7 miSaugus, MA★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Chestnut Woods Rehabilitation and Healthcare Ctr3.3 miSaugus, MA★★★★☆3/5
Regalcare at Glen Ridge3.7 miMedford, MA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Elmhurst Healthcare (the)3.8 miMelrose, MA★★★★★5/5
North End Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center4.0 miBoston, MA★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Revere →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 225297.