MassachusettsStoughton

Copley at Stoughton Nursing Care Center

380 Sumner Street, Stoughton, MA 02072 · Norfolk County · 123 certified beds · avg 95 residents/day · certified since Nov 15, 1994

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.66
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jul 31, 2023 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Aug 1, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (22)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 14, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure a transfer or discharge met the resident's needs and preferences, or did not properly prepare the resident to leave safely. · from a complaint
Dec 3, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
Dec 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Dec 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Dec 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Dec 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 3, 2025B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Oct 8, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 8, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Oct 8, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Oct 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow a resident's chosen representative — often a family member or someone with power of attorney — to exercise the resident's rights on their behalf. When a resident can't speak for themselves, their representative steps into that role.
Oct 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Oct 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Oct 8, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Oct 8, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jul 31, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jul 31, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jul 31, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment.
Jul 31, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jul 31, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows.
Jul 31, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (8 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202361G ▲
202480F
202570E
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMassachusetts avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.663.893.95top 12% in Massachusetts; top 19% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.920.650.69top 11% in Massachusetts; top 19% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.283.513.50top 12% in Massachusetts; top 16% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.640.460.48top 15% in Massachusetts; top 20% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)20.638.245.8top 4% in Massachusetts; top 3% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)33.342.642.9top 31% in Massachusetts; top 33% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.27, RN 0.85, weekend 3.92. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Partnership

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Goddard Restorative Care Unit inOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest67%12/26/2012
Saving Long Term Care CorporationOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest33%12/15/1999
Connor, MariaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2015
Connor, MariaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/31/2025
Goddard Restorative Care Unit inOrganizationGeneral Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/26/2012
Goddard Restorative Care Unit inOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/19/2024
O'Connell Unda, MariaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2013
O'Connell Unda, MariaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2013
Saving Long Term Care CorporationOrganizationGeneral Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/15/1999
Saving Long Term Care CorporationOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/18/2024
Tyer, StevenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2011
Tyer, StevenIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/20/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
The Center at Blue Hills1.0 miStoughton, MA★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Alliance Health at West Acres2.6 miBrockton, MA★★★★☆4/5
Brockton Post Acute Care3.0 miBrockton, MA★★★★☆3/5
The Guardian Center3.2 miBrockton, MA★☆☆☆☆2/5
Care One at Randolph3.5 miRandolph, MA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Southeast Rehabilitation & Skilled Care Center3.6 miNorth Easton, MA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Hellenic Nursing & Rehabilitation Center4.6 miCanton, MA★★★☆☆4/5
St Joseph Manor Health Care INC5.5 miBrockton, MA★★★★☆4/5
Champion Rehabilitation and Nursing Center5.6 miBrockton, MA★★☆☆☆3/5
Foremost at Sharon LLC5.9 miSharon, MA★★☆☆☆2/5
Colony Center for Health and Rehabilitation7.2 miAbington, MA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Affinity Healthcare7.2 miBraintree, MA★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Stoughton →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 225653.