How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Birch Pointe Health and Rehabilitation
3705 S Jefferson Ave, Springfield, MO 65807 (opens Google Maps) · Greene County · (417) 889-0773· 120 certified beds · avg 106 residents/day · certified since Dec 28, 2017 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: ANTHONY & BRYAN ADAMS (38 facilities, chain avg rating 3.8★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Feb 13, 2025
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Aug 22, 2024
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.63
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Aug 22, 2024 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Aug 22, 2024 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Oct 2, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 30 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. F-0561
The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. F-0677
View all 30 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Feb 13, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561 |
| Feb 13, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Feb 13, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Feb 13, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Feb 13, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Feb 13, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · F-0585 |
| Feb 13, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| Aug 22, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Jul 12, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Dec 1, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Dec 1, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Dec 1, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Dec 1, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561 |
| Dec 1, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625 |
| Dec 1, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. · F-0678 |
| Dec 1, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Aug 1, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Aug 1, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint · F-0690 |
| Aug 1, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide timely, approved x-ray services or have an agreement with an approved provider to supply them. · from a complaint · F-0776 |
| Jun 2, 2021 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jun 2, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · F-0602 |
| Jun 2, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jun 2, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Jun 2, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings. · F-0557 |
| Jun 2, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Jun 2, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Jun 2, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Jun 2, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents. · F-0790 |
| Jun 2, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems. · F-0805 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (7 → 8).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2021
All citations: 10
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 10
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2025
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 10 | 0 | F |
| 2023 | 10 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 2 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 8 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityMissouri averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.63
Missouri average: 3.66
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.67
Missouri average: 0.49
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.16
Missouri average: 3.22
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Missouri avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.63 | 3.66 | 3.95 | top 48% in Missouri; bottom 43% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.67 | 0.49 | 0.69 | top 15% in Missouri; top 40% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.16 | 3.22 | 3.50 | bottom 50% in Missouri; bottom 40% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.37 | 0.33 | 0.48 | top 26% in Missouri; bottom 46% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 63.3 | 56.0 | 45.8 | bottom 32% in Missouri; bottom 12% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 69.2 | 47.8 | 42.9 | bottom 19% in Missouri; bottom 12% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.24, RN 0.60, weekend 2.82.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.24 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Birch Pointe Health and Rehabilitation. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3b Holdings, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/13/2015 |
| 50 Eggs, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2020 |
| Adams, Anthony | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/13/2015 |
| Adams, Anthony | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/13/2015 |
| Adams, Bryan | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/13/2015 |
| Adams, Bryan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/13/2015 |
| Alumno, Martin | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/28/2024 |
| Alumno, Martin | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/28/2024 |
| Dvorak, Nora | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/28/2017 |
| Dvorak, Nora | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2017 |
| Dvorak, Nora | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/28/2017 |
| Ellis, John | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/28/2017 |
| First Security Bancorp | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/13/2015 |
| First Security Bank | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/13/2015 |
| Incite Rehab, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/28/2017 |
| Koehler, Tobey | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/28/2017 |
| Lowe, Clinton | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/15/2024 |
| Lowe, Clinton | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/15/2024 |
| Lowe, Clinton | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/15/2024 |
| LTC Systems/Rx, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/28/2017 |
Showing 20 of 30 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 10 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Anthony & Bryan Adams — 38 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- James River Nursing and Rehabilitation — Springfield, MO · overall 3/5
- Magnolia Square Nursing and Rehab — Springfield, MO · overall 2/5
- Maples Health and Rehabilitation, the — Springfield, MO · overall 4/5
- Alcoa Pines Health and Rehabilitation — Benton, AR · overall 3/5
- Amberwood Health and Rehabilitation — Benton, AR · overall 5/5
- Bailey Creek Health and Rehab — Texarkana, AR · overall 2/5
- Beebe Retirement Center, INC. — Beebe, AR · overall 4/5
- Care Manor Nursing and Rehab — Mountain Home, AR · overall 5/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 37 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "What choices do residents have over their daily schedule, like meal times, bathing, and activities?"
- "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
- "What is your approach to psychiatric medications — how do you try non-drug options first and work to reduce doses over time?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Walk me through what happens when a resident or family files a grievance — who responds and how fast?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Missouri midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 63% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 30 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 24 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cox Medical Centers Meyer Orthopedic and Surgical | 0.8 mi | Springfield, MO | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Springfield Villa | 0.9 mi | Springfield, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Maples Health and Rehabilitation, the | 1.4 mi | Springfield, MO | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Neighborhoods at Quail Creek, the | 1.4 mi | Springfield, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Spring Valley Health & Rehabilitation Center | 1.4 mi | Springfield, MO | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Springfield Rehabilitation & Health Care Center | 1.5 mi | Springfield, MO | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Sunterra Springs Springfield | 1.7 mi | Springfield, MO | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Magnolia Square Nursing and Rehab | 1.8 mi | Springfield, MO | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Manor at Elfindale, the | 2.9 mi | Springfield, MO | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| James River Nursing and Rehabilitation | 3.8 mi | Springfield, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Glendale Gardens Nursing & Rehab | 4.3 mi | Springfield, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Wilson's Creek Nursing & Rehab | 5.0 mi | Springfield, MO | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Greene, MO — 21 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Brookhaven Nursing & Rehab — Springfield, MO · overall 2/5
- Maranatha Village, INC — Springfield, MO · overall 4/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265865.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).