MissouriSpringfield

James River Nursing and Rehabilitation

3550 East Battlefield, Springfield, MO 65809 · Greene County · 120 certified beds · avg 98 residents/day · certified since Jan 17, 1997

Part of chain: ANTHONY & BRYAN ADAMS (38 facilities, chain avg rating 3.8★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.99
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (28)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 18, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Nov 4, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · from a complaint
Jul 30, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jul 30, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Jul 30, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jul 30, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jul 30, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jul 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Jul 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Jul 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Jul 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jul 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes.
Jul 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Jul 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jul 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Jul 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Jul 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Jul 30, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Feb 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Feb 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Feb 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint
Sep 23, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 23, 2022C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Oct 9, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Oct 9, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 9, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Oct 9, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Oct 9, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 16).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201950E
202220F
2024190F
202510E
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMissouri avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.993.663.95top 34% in Missouri; top 40% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.530.490.69top 33% in Missouri; bottom 42% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.273.223.50top 44% in Missouri; bottom 46% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.300.330.48top 42% in Missouri; bottom 32% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)64.056.045.8bottom 29% in Missouri; bottom 11% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)76.947.842.9bottom 11% in Missouri; bottom 7% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.60, RN 0.48, weekend 2.95. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Individual

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
3b Holdings, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2016
Adams, AnthonyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2016
Adams, AnthonyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2016
Adams, BryanIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2016
Adams, BryanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2016
Alumno, MartinIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/28/2024
Alumno, MartinIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/28/2024
Centennial BankOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/14/2022
Dvorak, NoraIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2017
Dvorak, NoraIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2017
Ellis, JohnIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2016
Greeneco Re East, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2016
Home BancsharesOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/14/2022
Incite Rehab, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2016
Koehler, TobeyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2016
Koehler, TobeyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2016
Long, KelseyIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE08/08/2023
Long, KelseyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/08/2023
Long, KelseyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/08/2023
LTC Systems/Rx, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2016

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Glendale Gardens Nursing & Rehab1.2 miSpringfield, MO★★★☆☆3/5
Spring Valley Health & Rehabilitation Center2.7 miSpringfield, MO★★☆☆☆1/5
Cox Medical Centers Meyer Orthopedic and Surgical3.1 miSpringfield, MO★★★★☆4/5
Springfield Villa3.2 miSpringfield, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5
Birch Pointe Health and Rehabilitation3.8 miSpringfield, MO★★★☆☆3/5
Sunterra Springs Springfield3.9 miSpringfield, MO★★★★☆3/5
Maples Health and Rehabilitation, the4.3 miSpringfield, MO★★★★☆3/5
Springfield Rehabilitation & Health Care Center4.8 miSpringfield, MO★★★★★4/5
Magnolia Square Nursing and Rehab4.9 miSpringfield, MO★★☆☆☆2/5
Neighborhoods at Quail Creek, the5.2 miSpringfield, MO★★★☆☆3/5
Copper Rock Healthcare5.3 miRogersville, MO★☆☆☆☆2/5
Manor at Elfindale, the5.4 miSpringfield, MO★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Springfield →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265664.