FloridaNaples

Adviniacare at Naples

7801 Airport Pulling Road N, Naples, FL 34109 · Collier County · 40 certified beds · avg 40 residents/day · certified since Jun 16, 1998

Part of chain: ADVINIACARE (11 facilities, chain avg rating 2.0★)

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
7
Serious findings on record
$231,990
Fines, last 3 years
3.97
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Apr 18, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: May 18, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Apr 18, 2025 · F-0835 · triggered by a complaint

The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.

Why it matters: Poor administration often shows up as understaffing, supply shortages, and care problems across the whole facility.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: May 18, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Apr 18, 2025 · F-0867 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.

Why it matters: Without a working quality program, the same care problems tend to repeat instead of getting fixed.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: May 18, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Nov 25, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Dec 24, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 7, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Apr 7, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 7, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Apr 7, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jul 7, 2022 · F-0791

The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.

Why it matters: Dental problems left untreated cause pain, infection, and trouble eating, which can lead to weight loss.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Aug 1, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (21)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 28, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
May 28, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
May 28, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.
May 28, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly inform residents or their representatives about arbitration agreements — contracts that give up the right to sue in court — including their right to refuse to sign.
Apr 18, 2025▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Apr 18, 2025▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · from a complaint
Apr 18, 2025▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · from a complaint
Nov 25, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Aug 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Mar 7, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Mar 7, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Mar 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Mar 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Mar 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Mar 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program.
Jul 7, 2022▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.
Jul 7, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Jul 7, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Jul 7, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Jul 7, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.
Jul 7, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202261G ▲
202483G ▲
202533K ▲
202640E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

3 fines totaling $231,990.

DateTypeAmount / length
Apr 18, 2025Fine$184,425
Nov 25, 2024Fine$10,033
Mar 7, 2024Fine$37,532

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityFlorida avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.974.033.95top 41% in Florida; top 40% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.910.760.69top 24% in Florida; top 20% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.863.683.50top 25% in Florida; top 27% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.580.530.48top 33% in Florida; top 25% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)41.541.445.8top 48% in Florida; top 40% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)50.046.042.9bottom 44% in Florida; bottom 39% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.55, RN 0.82, weekend 3.45. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Frederick S Frankel TrustOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
7801 Airport Pulling Road, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/10/2025
Berkowitz, BenjaminIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Berkowitz, BenjaminIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Berkowitz, BenjaminIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Berkowitz, DavidIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/10/2025
Boswell, SallyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Boswell, SallyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Curis Services LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
David a Berkowitz Revoc Tr David Berkowitz TteeOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Elterman, FrankIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Elterman, FrankIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Jean, DarlineIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Jean, DarlineIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Labella, CaterinaIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Labella, CaterinaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Labella, CaterinaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Labella, CaterinaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Meystel, YosefIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/10/2025
Pointe Group Care LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Solaris Senior Living North Naples2.2 miNaples, FL★★★☆☆2/5
Chateau at Moorings Park, the2.9 miNaples, FL★★★★★4/5
Premier Place at the Glenview3.0 miNaples, FL★★★★★5/5
Solaris Healthcare Imperial4.0 miNaples, FL★★★☆☆2/5
Naples Health and Rehabilitation Center4.4 miNaples, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Bentley Care Center5.1 miNaples, FL★★★☆☆2/5
Gardens at Terracina Health & Rehabilitation7.5 miNaples, FL★★★★★4/5
Renaissance at the Terraces8.2 miBonita Springs, FL★★★★☆3/5
Woodside Health and Rehabilitation Center8.6 miNaples, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Solaris Healthcare Lely Palms9.7 miNaples, FL★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Oakton Place Health and Rehabilitation at the Arli10.7 miNaples, FL★★☆☆☆1/5
Life Care Center of Estero12.8 miEstero, FL★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Naples →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105995.