How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Avamere Rehabilitation of King City
16485 SW Pacific Highway, Tigard, OR 97224 (opens Google Maps) · Washington County · (503) 620-5141· 148 certified beds · avg 65 residents/day · certified since Jun 1, 1976 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: AVAMERE (27 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Dec 5, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.64
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 33 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint F-0684
The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint F-0755
The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. F-0679
View all 33 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Feb 20, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755 |
| Dec 5, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
| Dec 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint · F-0550 |
| Dec 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · F-0552 |
| Dec 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Dec 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. · F-0605 |
| Dec 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| Dec 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety. · F-0740 |
| Dec 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755 |
| Jan 10, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint · F-0725 |
| Jul 19, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint · F-0725 |
| Jul 19, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
| Jul 19, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jul 19, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Jul 19, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Jul 19, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Jul 19, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · F-0676 |
| Jul 19, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Jul 19, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jul 19, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Jul 19, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems. · F-0805 |
| Jul 19, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Apr 10, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Apr 10, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · F-0727 |
| Apr 10, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Apr 10, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Apr 10, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · F-0585 |
| Apr 10, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Apr 10, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Apr 10, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Apr 10, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| Apr 10, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (11 → 8).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 10
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 12
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 9
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 10 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 12 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 9 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 2 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityOregon averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 4.64
Oregon average: 5.42
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.82
Oregon average: 0.78
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 4.13
Oregon average: 4.85
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Oregon avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.64 | 5.42 | 3.95 | bottom 13% in Oregon; top 20% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.82 | 0.78 | 0.69 | top 32% in Oregon; top 26% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.13 | 4.85 | 3.50 | bottom 14% in Oregon; top 19% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.46 | 0.48 | 0.48 | top 34% in Oregon; top 39% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 39.8 | 47.4 | 45.8 | top 28% in Oregon; top 36% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 50.0 | 51.6 | 42.9 | top 40% in Oregon; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.27, RN 0.75, weekend 3.80.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.27 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Avamere Rehabilitation of King City. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ari Operations, LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/06/2006 |
| Ariso LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/06/2006 |
| Avamere Group LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/06/2006 |
| Miller, Karl | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/30/2000 |
| Adams, Nancy | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2025 |
| Adams, Nancy | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2024 |
| Avamere Health Services LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2005 |
| Avamere Health Services LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/08/2025 |
| Avamere Skilled Advisors LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2005 |
| Avamere Skilled Advisors LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/08/2025 |
| Cavallo, Glen | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2025 |
| Cavallo, Glen | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2025 |
| Dana, Jennifer | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2022 |
| Dana, Jennifer | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2022 |
| Davis, Julie | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2024 |
| Doepker, Andrea | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/28/2023 |
| Doepker, Andrea | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/28/2023 |
| Feakin, Cody | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2025 |
| Feakin, Cody | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/15/2025 |
| Feakin, Cody | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
Showing 20 of 69 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 49 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Avamere — 27 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Avamere Rehabilitation of Lebanon — Lebanon, OR · overall 1/5
- Avamere Rehabilitation of Newport — Newport, OR · overall 4/5
- Avamere Rehabilitation of Oregon City — Oregon City, OR · overall 2/5
- Avamere Riverpark of Eugene — Eugene, OR · overall 2/5
- Avamere Transitional Care at Sunnyside — Salem, OR · overall 2/5
- The Pearl at Kruse Way — Lake Oswego, OR · overall 4/5
- Avamere at Pacific Ridge — Tacoma, WA · overall 2/5
- Avamere Olympic Rehabilitation of Sequim — Sequim, WA · overall 2/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 26 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
- "Can I see this month's activities calendar, and what do you offer residents who can't leave their rooms?"
- "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
- "How do you explain health changes and treatment options to residents and their families?"
- "Can you give me examples of how you adjust daily routines and room setups to fit each resident's preferences?"
- "What percentage of your residents are on antipsychotic or sedating medications, and how do you work to reduce that?"
- "How do you assess and manage residents' pain, especially for those who have trouble communicating?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Oregon midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 40% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 69 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 57 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tigard Rehabilitation and Care | 1.4 mi | Tigard, OR | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Marquis Tualatin Post Acute Rehab | 2.2 mi | Tualatin, OR | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| The Pearl at Kruse Way | 4.1 mi | Lake Oswego, OR | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Beaverton Post Acute Care of Cascadia | 5.3 mi | Beaverton, OR | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| West Hills Health & Rehabilitation | 5.5 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Maryville | 6.1 mi | Beaverton, OR | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Marquis Vermont Hills | 6.3 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Robison Jewish Health Center | 6.6 mi | Portland, OR | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Marquis Autumn Hills Memory Care | 6.7 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Avamere Crestview of Portland | 6.9 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Marquis Wilsonville Post Acute Rehab | 7.3 mi | Wilsonville, OR | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Fernwood Supportive Living at Madrona Grove | 7.5 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Washington, OR — 9 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Forest Grove Post Acute — Forest Grove, OR · overall 4/5
- Hillsboro Health and Rehabilitation — Hillsboro, OR · overall 4/5
- Marquis Forest Grove Post Acute Rehab — Forest Grove, OR · overall 5/5
- Avamere Rehabilitation of Hillsboro — Hillsboro, OR · overall 3/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 385132.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).