9700 Mashburn Blvd, Oklahoma City, OK 73162 (opens Google Maps) · Oklahoma County · (405) 721-2466· 120 certified beds · avg 96 residents/day · certified since Jun 1, 2000 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Abuse citation flag (CMS)
The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, pattern · Jul 19, 2024 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (K): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was a pattern: more than a limited occurrence, without being widespread. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Aug 29, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Oct 1, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Sep 23, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jul 19, 2024 · F-0688
The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Why it matters: Without this care, residents can develop stiff, contracted joints and lose the ability to move on their own.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Aug 29, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jul 19, 2024 · F-0758
The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Why it matters: Unneeded psychiatric medications can leave residents overly sedated and raise the risk of falls and other serious harm.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Aug 29, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 25 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint F-0880
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Oct 1, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Oct 16, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Oct 16, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · from a complaint · F-0604 |
| Jul 19, 2024 | ▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jul 19, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Jul 19, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Jul 19, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803 |
| Jul 19, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council. · F-0565 |
| Jul 19, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not give residents important notices in a format and language they can understand — for example, translated documents or accessible formats for those with vision or hearing loss. · F-0574 |
| Jul 19, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not give residents reasonable access to and privacy in using ways to communicate, such as phones, mail, and email. Residents have the right to stay in touch with the outside world privately. · F-0576 |
| Jul 19, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman. · F-0577 |
| Jul 19, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · F-0585 |
| Jul 19, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jul 19, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · F-0700 |
| Jul 19, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jul 19, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · F-0919 |
| Jul 19, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Jul 19, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| Jul 19, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Jul 19, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Jul 19, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Jul 19, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
| Jul 19, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jul 19, 2024 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies. · F-0838 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (21 → 2).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23 | 3 | K ▲ |
| 2025 | 2 | 1 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
2 fines totaling $28,695.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2025 | Fine | $10,358 |
| Jul 19, 2024 | Fine | $18,337 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Oklahoma avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 7.03 | 4.58 | 3.95 | top 1% in Oklahoma; top 1% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.50 | 0.41 | 0.69 | top 26% in Oklahoma; bottom 37% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 6.06 | 4.16 | 3.50 | top 1% in Oklahoma; top 2% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.29 | 0.28 | 0.48 | top 34% in Oklahoma; bottom 30% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 54.9 | 55.5 | 45.8 | top 48% in Oklahoma; bottom 25% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 42.9 | 53.6 | 42.9 | top 34% in Oklahoma; bottom 49% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 6.15, RN 0.43, weekend 5.29.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (6.15 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Baptist Village of Oklahoma City. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baptist Village Retirement Communities of Oklahoma, INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 09/26/1993 |
| Abbott, Paul | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/18/2025 |
| Abbott, Paul | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/18/2025 |
| Bancfirst | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/08/2013 |
| Bancfirst | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/12/2025 |
| Baptist Village Retirement Communities of Oklahoma, INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/26/1993 |
| Baptist Village Retirement Communities of Oklahoma, INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/26/1993 |
| Barrett, Jean | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/19/2024 |
| Barrett, Jean | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/19/2024 |
| Bell, Kevin | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/17/2020 |
| Bell, Kevin | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/17/2020 |
| Briggs, Parniece | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/18/2025 |
| Briggs, Parniece | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/18/2025 |
| Burrows, Doug | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/18/2025 |
| Burrows, Doug | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/18/2025 |
| Davis, Frank | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/29/2022 |
| Davis, Frank | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/29/2022 |
| Enlow, Linda | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/28/2023 |
| Enlow, Linda | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/28/2023 |
| Fisher, Todd | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/30/2021 |
Showing 20 of 87 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 67 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Health Center at Concordia | 0.4 mi | Oklahoma City, OK | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| St. Ann's Skilled Nursing and Therapy | 0.5 mi | Oklahoma City, OK | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| The Lakes | 2.1 mi | Oklahoma City, OK | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Heritage at Brandon Place Health & Rehabilitation | 2.8 mi | Oklahoma City, OK | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Warr Acres Nursing Center | 2.9 mi | Oklahoma City, OK | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Bellevue Health & Rehabilitation Center | 4.6 mi | Oklahoma City, OK | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Ignite Medical Resort Okc, LLC | 4.7 mi | Oklahoma City, OK | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Grand at Bethany Skilled Nursing and Therapy | 4.7 mi | Bethany, OK | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Heritage Manor | 5.0 mi | Oklahoma City, OK | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Heritage Park | 5.4 mi | Bethany, OK | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Tuscany Village Nursing Center | 5.5 mi | Oklahoma City, OK | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Northwest Nursing Center | 5.7 mi | Oklahoma City, OK | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Oklahoma, OK — 40 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 375381.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details