Park Place Healthcare and Rehab
1530 NE Grand Blvd, Oklahoma City, OK 73117 · Oklahoma County · 106 certified beds · avg 64 residents/day · certified since Oct 15, 2021
SFF
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: —/5 · CMS overall rating: —/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Aug 18, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.
Corrected: Sep 19, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jun 2, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.
Corrected: Jul 7, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 18, 2026 · F-0686
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Mar 25, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 18, 2026 · F-0755
The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Why it matters: Weak pharmacy services lead to medication mistakes, delays, and missed drug interactions that can seriously harm residents.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Mar 25, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Aug 18, 2025 · F-0600
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Sep 19, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
All citations in the current public record (35)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2026 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. |
| Feb 18, 2026 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. |
| Feb 18, 2026 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. · from a complaint |
| Feb 18, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. |
| Feb 18, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. |
| Feb 18, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Feb 18, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Feb 18, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. |
| Feb 18, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. |
| Feb 18, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. |
| Feb 18, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety. |
| Feb 18, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. |
| Feb 18, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. |
| Dec 10, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint |
| Aug 18, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Aug 18, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. |
| Aug 18, 2025 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman. |
| Aug 18, 2025 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. |
| Aug 18, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. |
| Aug 18, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. |
| Aug 18, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. |
| Aug 18, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. |
| Aug 18, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
| Aug 18, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Aug 18, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Jun 2, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Jun 2, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint |
| Jun 2, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint |
| Feb 14, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · from a complaint |
| Feb 14, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint |
| Feb 14, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Feb 14, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Aug 23, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Apr 19, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint |
| Apr 19, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (11 → 13).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 3 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 19 | 3 | J ▲ |
| 2026 | 13 | 2 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
6 fines totaling $131,280, plus 2 Medicare payment denial periods.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2026 | Fine | $23,431 |
| Feb 18, 2026 | Fine | $26,685 |
| Aug 18, 2025 | Fine | $17,799 |
| Jun 2, 2025 | Fine | $40,912 |
| Feb 25, 2025 | Payment Denial | 7 days from Mar 14, 2025 |
| Aug 23, 2024 | Fine | $10,712 |
| Aug 23, 2024 | Payment Denial | 6 days from Oct 2, 2024 |
| May 22, 2024 | Fine | $11,741 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Oklahoma avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.27 | 4.58 | 3.95 | top 17% in Oklahoma; top 10% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.32 | 0.41 | 0.69 | bottom 36% in Oklahoma; bottom 12% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.70 | 4.16 | 3.50 | bottom 22% in Oklahoma; top 33% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.27 | 0.28 | 0.48 | top 44% in Oklahoma; bottom 25% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 88.4 | 55.5 | 45.8 | bottom 1% in Oklahoma; bottom 1% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 83.3 | 53.6 | 42.9 | bottom 16% in Oklahoma; bottom 4% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.14, RN 0.26, weekend 2.91. Staffing rating: —/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: —/5 · long-stay residents: —/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selectis Health INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 03/26/2021 |
| Desmond, Adam | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/26/2021 |
| Desmond, Adam | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/18/2024 |
| Eckhart, Krystal | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/28/2023 |
| Eckhart, Krystal | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/26/2021 |
| Selectis Management LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/26/2021 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
- "How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
- "How do your actual daily staffing levels compare to what's reported on Medicare's Care Compare website?"
- "If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
- "How soon after admission is a full assessment completed, and how are the findings shared with the family?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kingwood Skilled Nursing and Therapy | 0.9 mi | Oklahoma City, OK | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Mid-Del Skilled Nursing and Therapy | 1.7 mi | Del City, OK | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Wildewood Skilled Nursing and Therapy | 2.7 mi | Oklahoma City, OK | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Cross Timbers Nursing and Rehabilitation | 3.5 mi | Midwest City, OK | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Emerald Care Center Midwest | 4.3 mi | Midwest City, OK | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Midwest City Post Acute & Rehab | 4.5 mi | Midwest City, OK | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| South Park East | 4.8 mi | Oklahoma City, OK | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| The Wilshire Skilled Nursing and Therapy | 5.1 mi | Oklahoma City, OK | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Sienna Extended Care & Rehab | 6.1 mi | Midwest City, OK | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Fairmont Skilled Nursing and Therapy | 6.1 mi | Oklahoma City, OK | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Emerald Care Center Southwest LLC | 6.1 mi | Oklahoma City, OK | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| The Lodge at Brookline | 6.4 mi | Oklahoma City, OK | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
All facilities in Oklahoma City →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 375582.