FloridaClewiston

Vivo Healthcare Clewiston

301 South Gloria St, Clewiston, FL 33440 · Hendry County · 155 certified beds · avg 117 residents/day · certified since Feb 1, 1984

Part of chain: VIVO HEALTHCARE (12 facilities, chain avg rating 2.4★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$33,248
Fines, last 3 years
3.98
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 7, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 1, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 7, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 1, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (17)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 18, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Apr 7, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Apr 7, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Apr 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition.
Apr 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Apr 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Jul 14, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jul 14, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jul 14, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Jul 14, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's activities program was not run by a qualified professional. The person directing recreation and social activities must have proper training or credentials.
Jul 14, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Jul 14, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Dec 10, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202010D
202260D
202470E
202522G ▲
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $33,248.

DateTypeAmount / length
Apr 7, 2025Fine$33,248

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityFlorida avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.984.033.95top 41% in Florida; top 40% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.440.760.69bottom 15% in Florida; bottom 28% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.713.683.50top 35% in Florida; top 33% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.280.530.48bottom 18% in Florida; bottom 28% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)33.341.445.8top 29% in Florida; top 20% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)42.946.042.9top 43% in Florida; bottom 49% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.47, RN 0.38, weekend 3.24. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Allegiant Healthcare of Florida LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest11/16/2017
Asmsy LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest11/16/2017
Clewiston Nursing & Rehabilitation Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest50%12/01/2019
Fein, ArielIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest11/16/2017
Goldner, SamuelIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest11/16/2017
Irving Langer 2014 Family Trust U/T/AOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest11/16/2017
Karmel, JacobIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest11/16/2017
Palm Investco V LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest12/01/2019
Palm Terrace J Dek Operations LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest50%12/01/2019
Palm Terrace J Dek Operations LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest12/01/2019
Solomon Vizcaya Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest11/16/2017
Zaidys LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest11/16/2017
Brevil, YvroniseIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE11/16/2017

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Glades Health Care Center18.0 miPahokee, FL★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 1 closest →

All facilities in Clewiston →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105462.