How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Vivo Healthcare Gandy
4610 S Manhattan Ave, Tampa, FL 33611 (opens Google Maps) · Hillsborough County · (813) 839-5311· 160 certified beds · avg 144 residents/day · certified since Dec 1, 1984 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: VIVO HEALTHCARE (12 facilities, chain avg rating 2.4★)
1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jan 16, 2025
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Mar 27, 2026
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.86
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Mar 27, 2026 · F-0578 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Mar 27, 2026 · F-0578 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Why it matters: Ignoring these rights means residents may receive treatments they refused, or miss having their end-of-life wishes respected.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Apr 25, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 23 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · from a complaint F-0578
The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · from a complaint F-0835
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint F-0880
View all 23 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2026 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · from a complaint · F-0578 |
| Jan 30, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · from a complaint · F-0835 |
| Jan 30, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Jan 30, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint · F-0585 |
| Jan 30, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Jan 30, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Jan 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Jan 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Jan 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jan 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jan 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · F-0694 |
| Jan 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Jan 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Nov 3, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · F-0585 |
| Nov 3, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Nov 3, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Nov 3, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| May 20, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| May 20, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · F-0694 |
| May 20, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| May 20, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561 |
| May 20, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · F-0585 |
| May 20, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 7).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2021
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2022
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 7
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 1
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2022 | 4 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 7 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 6 | 1 | J ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityFlorida averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.86
Florida average: 4.03
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.60
Florida average: 0.76
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.48
Florida average: 3.68
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Florida avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.86 | 4.03 | 3.95 | bottom 49% in Florida; top 46% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.60 | 0.76 | 0.69 | bottom 41% in Florida; top 48% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.48 | 3.68 | 3.50 | bottom 45% in Florida; top 43% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.37 | 0.53 | 0.48 | bottom 35% in Florida; bottom 47% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 39.7 | 41.4 | 45.8 | top 44% in Florida; top 35% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 54.5 | 46.0 | 42.9 | bottom 33% in Florida; bottom 29% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.67, RN 0.58, weekend 3.32.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.67 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Vivo Healthcare Gandy. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 Moshes Realty LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2025 |
| Aml Carolina LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2025 |
| Ayc Investments LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2025 |
| Becker, Yitzchok | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2025 |
| Compton, Mordechai | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2025 |
| Cukier, Avrohom | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2025 |
| David, Miriam | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2025 |
| David, Tova | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2025 |
| Dieguez, Jessica | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2025 |
| Elef Investments LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2025 |
| Elieman Holdings LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2025 |
| Gandy Holdco LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 07/01/2025 |
| Gluck, Benjamin | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 9% | 07/01/2025 |
| Jakobovits, Elie | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2025 |
| Jakobovits, Nathan | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2025 |
| Jek Irrv Tr II | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 5% | 07/01/2025 |
| Kagan, Jeffrey | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2025 |
| Landsman, Dvora | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2025 |
| Levy, Elie | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2025 |
| Librowicz, Emanuel | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2025 |
Showing 20 of 62 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 42 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Vivo Healthcare — 12 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Vivo Healthcare Lakeland — Lakeland, FL · overall 1/5
- Vivo Healthcare Meadows — Sarasota, FL · overall 1/5
- Vivo Healthcare Normandy — Jacksonville, FL · overall 4/5
- Vivo Healthcare Orange Park — Orange Park, FL · overall 5/5
- Vivo Healthcare Sebring — Sebring, FL · overall 3/5
- Vivo Healthcare University — Jacksonville, FL · overall 4/5
- Vivo Healthcare Wauchula — Wauchula, FL · overall 2/5
- Vivo Healthcare Winter Haven — Winter Haven, FL · overall 1/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 11 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
- "What were the findings behind this administration citation, and what has leadership changed since?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Walk me through what happens when a resident or family files a grievance — who responds and how fast?"
- "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
- "If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "How do you screen new residents for mental health and disability-related needs, and how do you provide the specialized services they require?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Florida midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 40% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 62 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 90 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bayshore Pointe Nursing and Rehab Center | 1.4 mi | Tampa, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Canterbury Towers INC | 1.9 mi | Tampa, FL | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Ybor City Center for Rehabilitation and Healing | 5.9 mi | Tampa, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center of Tampa | 6.2 mi | Tampa, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Aviata at the Bay | 6.4 mi | Tampa, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Elon Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 6.8 mi | Tampa, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Whispering Oaks | 7.7 mi | Tampa, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Aventura at the Bay | 7.7 mi | Saint Petersburg, FL | —/5 | abuseSFF | |
| Shore Acres Care Center and Rehab | 7.7 mi | Saint Petersburg, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Brighton Bay Center for Rehabilitation and Healing | 7.8 mi | Saint Petersburg, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Woodbridge Care Center and Rehab | 8.3 mi | Tampa, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Vivo Healthcare St Petersburg | 8.6 mi | Saint Petersburg, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Hillsborough, FL — 30 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Aviata at Central Park — Brandon, FL · overall 3/5
- Aviata at Fletcher — Tampa, FL · overall 1/5
- Aviata at Oakfield — Brandon, FL · overall 2/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105491.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).