How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
4020 Loma Vista Road, Ventura, CA 93003 (opens Google Maps) · Ventura County · (805) 642-4196· 71 certified beds · avg 64 residents/day · certified since Mar 31, 1967 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: THE MANDELBAUM FAMILY (18 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 17 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. F-0677
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. F-0761
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jun 12, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Jun 12, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jun 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jun 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Mar 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint · F-0658 |
| Apr 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint · F-0921 |
| Dec 8, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings. · F-0557 |
| Dec 8, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Dec 8, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636 |
| Dec 8, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Dec 8, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Dec 8, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · F-0806 |
| Dec 8, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. · F-0908 |
| Jun 24, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Jun 24, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Jun 24, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide or arrange specialized rehabilitation services — such as physical, occupational, or speech therapy — for residents who needed them. · F-0825 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 5).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2023 | 7 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 6 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | California avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.82 | 4.31 | 3.95 | top 19% in California; top 16% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.70 | 0.61 | 0.69 | top 24% in California; top 37% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.39 | 3.90 | 3.50 | top 17% in California; top 14% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.52 | 0.51 | 0.48 | top 29% in California; top 31% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 25.0 | 36.7 | 45.8 | top 17% in California; top 7% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 12.5 | 38.1 | 42.9 | top 8% in California; top 6% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.70, RN 0.68, weekend 4.28.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.70 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Ventura Post Acute. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Individual
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simcha and Janet Mandelbaum Family Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 20% | 12/01/2021 |
| The Bentzion Mandelbaum 2021 Irrevocable Gift Trust No. 2 | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 50% | 12/01/2021 |
| The Janet Mandelbaum 2021 Irrevocable Gift Trust No 2 | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 16% | 12/01/2021 |
| The Simcha Mandelbaum 2021 Irrevocable Gift Trust No. 2 | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 14% | 12/01/2021 |
| Agapito, Maricarl Agapito | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/09/2023 |
| Agapito, Maricarl Agapito | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/09/2023 |
| Anos, Christelle | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2016 |
| Anos, Christelle | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2016 |
| Bradley, Chandra | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2016 |
| Bradley, Chandra | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2016 |
| Castro-Garcia, Maria | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/06/2019 |
| Castro-Garcia, Maria | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/06/2019 |
| Hansen | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Jones, Renee | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2016 |
| Jones, Renee | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2016 |
| Mandelbaum, Brenda | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/27/2025 |
| Mandelbaum, Janet | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2021 |
| Mandelbaum, Janet | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2021 |
| Marin, Rafael | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2016 |
| Marin, Rafael | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2016 |
Showing 20 of 32 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 12 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain The Mandelbaum Family — 18 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 17 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coastal View Healthcare Center | 0.6 mi | Ventura, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Victoria Care Center | 1.7 mi | Ventura, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Oxnard Manor Healthcare Center | 5.0 mi | Oxnard, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Glenwood Care Center | 5.6 mi | Oxnard, CA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Shoreline Care Center | 7.7 mi | Oxnard, CA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Maywood Acres Healthcare | 7.9 mi | Oxnard, CA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Santa Paula Post Acute Center | 10.4 mi | Santa Paula, CA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Community Memorial Continuing Care Center | 11.4 mi | Ojai, CA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Camarillo Healthcare Center | 11.7 mi | Camarillo, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Ojai Health & Rehabilitation | 12.1 mi | Ojai, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| St. John's Hospital Camarillo D/P SNF | 12.8 mi | Camarillo, CA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Alta Healthcare Center of Camarillo | 14.7 mi | Camarillo, CA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Ventura, CA — 19 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 055719.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details