How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
9620 Fremont Ave, Montclair, CA 91763 (opens Google Maps) · San Bernardino County · (909) 621-4751· 140 certified beds · avg 125 residents/day · certified since Mar 15, 1974 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: THE MANDELBAUM FAMILY (18 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 19 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · from a complaint F-0757
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Feb 26, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jan 2, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · from a complaint · F-0757 |
| May 7, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not let a resident or their legal representative see or buy copies of the resident's own records. · from a complaint · F-0573 |
| Nov 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint · F-0550 |
| Nov 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Oct 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jul 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Feb 10, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have enough support staff to safely and effectively run its food and nutrition service. · F-0802 |
| Feb 10, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Feb 10, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Feb 10, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803 |
| Feb 10, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Feb 10, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Feb 10, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · F-0676 |
| Feb 10, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Feb 10, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Feb 10, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Feb 10, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · F-0919 |
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 11 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 4 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 3 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | California avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.66 | 4.31 | 3.95 | bottom 18% in California; bottom 44% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.44 | 0.61 | 0.69 | bottom 43% in California; bottom 29% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.36 | 3.90 | 3.50 | bottom 19% in California; top 49% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.56 | 0.51 | 0.48 | top 25% in California; top 27% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 26.5 | 36.7 | 45.8 | top 21% in California; top 9% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 25.0 | 38.1 | 42.9 | top 26% in California; top 20% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.50, RN 0.66, weekend 5.06.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (5.50 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Community Extended Care Hospital of Montclair. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Castro-Garcia, Maria | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Castro-Garcia, Maria | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/06/2019 |
| Castro-Garcia, Maria | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/06/2019 |
| Cosme, Rodolfo | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/03/2024 |
| Cosme, Rodolfo | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/03/2024 |
| Daliva, John | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2023 |
| Daliva, John | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2023 |
| Fremont NF LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/1986 |
| Hansen | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Hansen | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/25/2025 |
| Hidalgo, Analiza | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/21/2013 |
| Hidalgo, Analiza | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/21/2013 |
| Landingin, Anne | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/16/2024 |
| Landingin, Anne | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/16/2024 |
| Mandelbaum, Brenda | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/10/2026 |
| Mandelbaum, Janet | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/02/2019 |
| Mandelbaum, Simcha | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2026 |
| Mandelbaum, Simcha | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2026 |
| Pham, Julie | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/16/2000 |
| Pham, Julie | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/16/2000 |
Showing 20 of 26 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 6 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain The Mandelbaum Family — 18 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 17 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Montclair Manor Care Center | 1.0 mi | Montclair, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Claremont Heights Post Acute | 1.8 mi | Claremont, CA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Claremont Manor Care Center | 2.6 mi | Claremont, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Heritage Park Nursing Center | 2.6 mi | Upland, CA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Pilgrim Place Health Services Center | 2.6 mi | Claremont, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Las Colinas Post Acute | 2.9 mi | Ontario, CA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Ontario Grove Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LP | 2.9 mi | Ontario, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Inland Christian Home | 3.1 mi | Ontario, CA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Mount San Antonio Gardens | 3.1 mi | Pomona, CA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Upland Rehabilitation and Care Center | 3.2 mi | Upland, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Villa Mesa Care Center | 3.3 mi | Upland, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Ontario Healthcare Center | 3.4 mi | Ontario, CA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in San Bernardino, CA — 55 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 056444.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details