How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Tuckerman Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center
5550 Tuckerman Lane, North Bethesda, MD 20852 (opens Google Maps) · Montgomery County · (301) 897-8566· 41 certified beds · avg 34 residents/day · certified since Apr 10, 1998 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES (87 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)
5/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Feb 25, 2021
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.89
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 23 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not make sure a transfer or discharge met the resident's needs and preferences, or did not properly prepare the resident to leave safely. · from a complaint F-0627
The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · from a complaint F-0628
The facility did not allow a resident's chosen representative — often a family member or someone with power of attorney — to exercise the resident's rights on their behalf. When a resident can't speak for themselves, their representative steps into that role. · from a complaint F-0551
View all 23 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make sure a transfer or discharge met the resident's needs and preferences, or did not properly prepare the resident to leave safely. · from a complaint · F-0627 |
| Nov 5, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · from a complaint · F-0628 |
| Nov 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow a resident's chosen representative — often a family member or someone with power of attorney — to exercise the resident's rights on their behalf. When a resident can't speak for themselves, their representative steps into that role. · from a complaint · F-0551 |
| Nov 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. · from a complaint · F-0605 |
| Nov 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility required residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits or pay privately as a condition of moving in, or failed to tell residents which types of care it does not provide. Both practices are against the rules. · from a complaint · F-0620 |
| Apr 25, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Feb 25, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide or obtain laboratory tests when a doctor ordered them, or did not promptly report the results back to the doctor who ordered them. · F-0773 |
| Jul 3, 2019 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jul 3, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jul 3, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. · F-0908 |
| May 14, 2018 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| May 14, 2018 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| May 14, 2018 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| May 14, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| May 14, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580 |
| May 14, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. · F-0678 |
| May 14, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| May 14, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| May 14, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| May 14, 2018 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814 |
| May 14, 2018 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| May 14, 2018 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| May 14, 2018 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · F-0867 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 1).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2018
All citations: 13
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2019
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2021
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 13 | 0 | E |
| 2019 | 3 | 0 | E |
| 2021 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 6 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityMaryland averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 2.89
Maryland average: 3.83
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.85
Maryland average: 0.83
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.64
Maryland average: 3.43
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Maryland avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.89 | 3.83 | 3.95 | bottom 3% in Maryland; bottom 10% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.85 | 0.83 | 0.69 | top 30% in Maryland; top 24% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.64 | 3.43 | 3.50 | bottom 6% in Maryland; bottom 14% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.83 | 0.63 | 0.48 | top 17% in Maryland; top 10% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 35.7 | 40.2 | 45.8 | top 36% in Maryland; top 26% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 22.2 | 38.7 | 42.9 | top 15% in Maryland; top 17% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.84, RN 1.13, weekend 3.51.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.84 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: —/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Tuckerman Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quinto Nexgen LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2023 |
| Rsbrmk Holdings LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2023 |
| SK Nexgen Tr | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2023 |
| Skilled Venture LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2023 |
| Tryko Nexgen Holdings LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2023 |
| Uak 2020 Irrv Tr | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2023 |
| Ukr Nexgen LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2023 |
| Yk Nexgen Tr | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2023 |
| Yr Nexgen Tr | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2023 |
| Dawodu, Hakeem | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/18/2024 |
| Dawodu, Hakeem | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/18/2024 |
| Dawodu, Hakeem | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/18/2024 |
| Gunthorpe, Jahiri | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2023 |
| Gunthorpe, Jahiri | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2023 |
| Israel Discount Bank of New York - Idb Bank of York | Organization | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/21/2023 |
| Marquis Limited LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2023 |
| Marquis Limited LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2023 |
| NFR 2020 Irrv Tr | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2023 |
| Nutraco LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/12/2024 |
| Nutraco LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/12/2024 |
Showing 20 of 37 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 17 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Marquis Health Services — 87 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Westgate Hills Rehab & Healthcare Ctr — Baltimore, MD · overall 2/5
- Nashua Post Acute Care — Nashua, NH · overall 1/5
- Allendale Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Allendale, NJ · overall 4/5
- Arbor Ridge Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Wayne, NJ · overall 2/5
- Avalon Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Hamilton, NJ · overall 1/5
- Berlin Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Berlin, NJ · overall 4/5
- Cambridge Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Moorestown, NJ · overall 3/5
- Coral Harbor Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Neptune City, NJ · overall 4/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 86 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Before a resident is discharged or transferred, how do you make sure the new place can actually meet their needs?"
- "What written notices do we get before any transfer or discharge, and what is your bed-hold policy?"
- "How do you involve a resident's representative in care decisions, and how quickly are they consulted?"
- "What percentage of your residents are on antipsychotic or sedating medications, and how do you work to reduce that?"
- "Do you accept Medicaid from day one, and will you put in writing that no private payment is required as a condition of admission?"
- "If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
- "When a doctor orders lab work, how quickly is it done and how are results communicated back?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Maryland midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 36% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 37 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 88 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sterling Care Bethesda | 0.5 mi | Bethesda, MD | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Montcare at Bethesda | 1.1 mi | Bethesda, MD | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Maplewood Park Place | 1.1 mi | Bethesda, MD | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Hebrew Home of Greater Washington | 1.7 mi | Rockville, MD | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Carriage Hill Bethesda | 1.8 mi | Bethesda, MD | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Complete Care at Wheaton | 2.7 mi | Wheaton, MD | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Turtle Creek Rehabilitation and Wellness Center | 2.8 mi | Kensington, MD | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Autumn Lake Healthcare at Oakview | 3.1 mi | Silver Spring, MD | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Autumn Lake Healthcare at Chevy Chase | 3.3 mi | Chevy Chase, MD | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Montcare at Wheaton | 3.6 mi | Wheaton, MD | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Potomac Valley Rehabilitation and Healthcare | 4.0 mi | Rockville, MD | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Woodside Rehab & Nursing | 4.2 mi | Silver Spring, MD | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Montgomery, MD — 34 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Wilson Health Care Center — Gaithersburg, MD · overall 5/5
- Althea Woodland Nursing Home — Silver Spring, MD · overall 4/5
- Autumn Lake Healthcare at Arcola — Silver Spring, MD · overall 4/5
- Autumn Lake Healthcare at Oak Manor — Burtonsville, MD · overall 4/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 215320.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).