MarylandGaithersburg

Wilson Health Care Center

301 Russell Avenue, Gaithersburg, MD 20877 · Montgomery County · 285 certified beds · avg 163 residents/day · certified since Apr 10, 1975

Part of chain: ASBURY COMMUNITIES (5 facilities, chain avg rating 5.0★)

5/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.23
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (28)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 1, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
May 1, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint
May 1, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have.
May 1, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
May 1, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
May 1, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Apr 10, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Apr 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Apr 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Apr 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out.
Apr 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Apr 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Apr 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Apr 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Jan 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint
Jan 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jan 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Jan 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Jan 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Mar 13, 2020E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Mar 13, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Mar 13, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Mar 13, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Mar 13, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Mar 13, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Mar 13, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Mar 13, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 13, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202090E
2025130E
202660D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMaryland avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.233.833.95top 20% in Maryland; top 31% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.090.830.69top 15% in Maryland; top 12% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.763.433.50top 19% in Maryland; top 31% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.800.630.48top 19% in Maryland; top 11% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)13.540.245.8top 1% in Maryland; top 1% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)19.038.742.9top 10% in Maryland; top 13% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.12, RN 1.06, weekend 3.66. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Asbury Communities INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%06/01/2006
Andrews, ToddIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Andrews, ToddIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Andrews, ToddIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Andrews, ToddIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Asbury Communities INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2006
Harbison, BarbaraIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Hill-Milbourne, VeronicaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Jeanneret, AndrewIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/07/2017
Jeanneret, AndrewIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/07/2017
Joseph, AndrewIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2006
Joseph, AndrewIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/02/2001
Kruth, RachelIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/17/2017
Kruth, RachelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/04/2025
Matus Garcia, MarianaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Shuman, RichardIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Sproles, EfondaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Tavakoli-Jalili, NaderIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/04/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Montgomery Village Care Center1.6 miGaithersburg, MD★★★★★5/5
Ingleside at King Farm2.7 miRockville, MD★★★★★4/5
Shady Grove Nursing and Rehabilitation Center3.2 miRockville, MD★★☆☆☆1/5
Collingswood Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center4.3 miRockville, MD★★☆☆☆2/5
Sterling Care Rockville Nursing4.7 miRockville, MD★★★★☆3/5
The Village at Rockville4.9 miRockville, MD★★★☆☆3/5
Potomac Valley Rehabilitation and Healthcare5.5 miRockville, MD★★★☆☆2/5
Bedford Court Healthcare Cent.7.3 miSilver Spring, MD★★★★★4/5
Hebrew Home of Greater Washington7.7 miRockville, MD★★★★★4/5
Montcare at Potomac8.1 miPotomac, MD★★★★★4/5
Layhill Nursing and Rehabilitation Center8.3 miSilver Spring, MD★☆☆☆☆1/5
Brooke Grove Rehab. & Nsg Ctr8.5 miSandy Spring, MD★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Gaithersburg →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 215099.