Althea Woodland Nursing Home
1000 Daleview Drive, Silver Spring, MD 20901 · Montgomery County · 50 certified beds · avg 49 residents/day · certified since Jun 1, 1991
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
All citations in the current public record (30)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint |
| Apr 25, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Apr 25, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. |
| Apr 25, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences. |
| Apr 25, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. |
| Apr 25, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Apr 25, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| Apr 25, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. |
| Apr 25, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. |
| Apr 25, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. |
| Apr 25, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. |
| Apr 25, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Apr 25, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. |
| Apr 25, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention. |
| Aug 2, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · from a complaint |
| Aug 2, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not let a resident return after a hospital stay or approved leave that lasted longer than the facility's bed-hold policy allowed. Residents generally have the right to come back to the next available bed. · from a complaint |
| Aug 2, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | When a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care. · from a complaint |
| Apr 9, 2021 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. |
| Apr 9, 2021 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Apr 9, 2021 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. |
| Jul 11, 2019 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. |
| Jul 11, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Jul 11, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| Jul 11, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. |
| Jul 11, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. |
| Jul 11, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. |
| Jul 11, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide residents with enough to drink, or with drinks matching their needs and preferences, to keep them properly hydrated. |
| Jul 11, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Jul 11, 2019 | C · Minimal risk, facility-wide | The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. |
| Jul 11, 2019 | B · Minimal risk, repeated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 13).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 10 | 0 | E |
| 2021 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 13 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Maryland avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.99 | 3.83 | 3.95 | top 27% in Maryland; top 40% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.61 | 0.83 | 0.69 | bottom 37% in Maryland; top 47% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.65 | 3.43 | 3.50 | top 25% in Maryland; top 35% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.46 | 0.63 | 0.48 | bottom 41% in Maryland; top 39% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 18.9 | 40.2 | 45.8 | top 6% in Maryland; top 2% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 0.0 | 38.7 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.70, RN 0.57, weekend 3.38. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meyer, Philip | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2010 |
| Meyer, Toni | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 50% | 05/01/2010 |
| Meyer, Philip | Individual | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2010 |
| Meyer, Philip | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2010 |
| Meyer, Philip | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2010 |
| Meyer, Philip | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2010 |
| Meyer, Philip | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2010 |
| Meyer, Philip | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2010 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
- "How are residents and families included in care plan meetings, and how often do those meetings happen?"
- "How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
- "How do you monitor residents' weight and eating, and what happens when someone starts losing weight?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adelphi Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 0.9 mi | Adelphi, MD | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Sligo Creek Healthcare | 1.9 mi | Takoma Park, MD | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Autumn Lake Healthcare at Arcola | 2.6 mi | Silver Spring, MD | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Woodside Rehab & Nursing | 2.7 mi | Silver Spring, MD | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| White Oak Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 2.7 mi | Hyattsville, MD | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Sterling Care Hillhaven | 2.8 mi | Adelphi, MD | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Fox Chase Healthcare | 2.9 mi | Silver Spring, MD | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Complete Care at Springbrook | 3.5 mi | Silver Spring, MD | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Autumn Lake Healthcare at Oakview | 3.6 mi | Silver Spring, MD | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Riderwood Village | 3.9 mi | Silver Spring, MD | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Sacred Heart Home INC | 3.9 mi | Hyattsville, MD | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Complete Care at Hyattsville | 4.0 mi | Hyattsville, MD | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
All facilities in Silver Spring →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 215228.