North CarolinaWilmington

Trinity Grove

631 Junction Creek Drive, Wilmington, NC 28412 · New Hanover County · 100 certified beds · avg 95 residents/day · certified since Jun 29, 2011

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

Part of chain: LUTHERAN SERVICES CAROLINAS (9 facilities, chain avg rating 4.2★)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
4
Serious findings on record
$102,910
Fines, last 3 years
4.83
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Aug 5, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Nov 21, 2023 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Aug 5, 2024 · F-0607 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.

Why it matters: Without working prevention policies, mistreatment is more likely to happen and less likely to be caught.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Nov 21, 2023 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Sep 18, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Sep 26, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Oct 10, 2024 · F-0600

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Oct 30, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (15)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Sep 18, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Sep 18, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council.
Sep 18, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 18, 2025C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Sep 18, 2025B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Oct 10, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Oct 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Oct 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide special eating equipment and utensils — like adaptive cups or easy-grip silverware — for residents who need them, along with appropriate help at meals.
Aug 5, 2024▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Aug 5, 2024▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint
Aug 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Jul 13, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jul 13, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jul 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jul 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly run its feeding assistant program — assessing which residents are appropriate for it, following each resident's care plan, and making sure feeding assistants are trained and supervised. Feeding assistants are trained helpers who assist residents at mealtimes.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202340E
202463K ▲
202551G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

4 fines totaling $102,910.

DateTypeAmount / length
Sep 18, 2025Fine$64,740
Oct 10, 2024Fine$21,085
Aug 5, 2024Fine$8,542
Aug 5, 2024Fine$8,543

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNorth Carolina avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.834.013.95top 14% in North Carolina; top 16% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.920.640.69top 15% in North Carolina; top 20% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.263.563.50top 14% in North Carolina; top 16% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.420.410.48top 31% in North Carolina; top 44% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)45.549.045.8top 42% in North Carolina; bottom 49% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)30.845.742.9top 25% in North Carolina; top 30% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.37, RN 0.83, weekend 3.85. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Church related

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Goins, TedIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE11/04/2004
Goins, TedIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/04/2004
Goins, TedIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/04/2004
Goins, TedIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/04/2004
Herman, RichardIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2021
Herman, RichardIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2021
Lsa Management, INC.OrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/30/2007
Lsa Management, INC.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/16/2025
Lutheran Home Wilmington Property, INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/05/1988
Lutheran Home Wilmington Property, INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/14/2025
Lutheran Services for the Aging, INC.OrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/30/2007
Lutheran Services for the Aging, INC.OrganizationTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/30/2007
Lutheran Services for the Aging, INC.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/25/2025
Maddry, KarenIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/30/2007
Nelson, DouglasIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2022
Nelson, DouglasIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2022
Nickerson, KirbyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2012
Nickerson, KirbyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2012
Parrish, JamesIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/25/2022
Parrish, JamesIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/25/2022

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Autumn Care of Myrtle Grove1.0 miWilmington, NC★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Azalea Health & Rehab Center3.0 miWilmington, NC★★☆☆☆2/5
August Healthcare at Wilmington4.3 miWilmington, NC★★☆☆☆3/5
Peak Resources-Wilmington, INC4.4 miWilmington, NC★☆☆☆☆1/5
Cypress Pointe Rehabilitation Center5.0 miWilmington, NC★★★★★5/5
Brunswick Cove Nursing Center6.3 miWinnabow, NC★★☆☆☆3/5
Bradley Creek Health Center6.8 miWilmington, NC★★★★★5/5
Liberty Commons Rehabilitation Center7.0 miWilmington, NC★★☆☆☆2/5
Davis Health and Wellness Center at Cambridge Vill10.3 miWilmington, NC★★☆☆☆2/5
Northchase Nursing and Rehabilitation Center11.3 miWilmington, NC★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Wilmington →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 345554.