North CarolinaWilmington

Azalea Health & Rehab Center

3800 Independence Boulevard, Wilmington, NC 28412 · New Hanover County · 80 certified beds · avg 78 residents/day · certified since Feb 13, 2013

Part of chain: SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP (126 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$24,470
Fines, last 3 years
3.30
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jul 19, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jul 12, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 31, 2024 · F-0550 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.

Why it matters: Being treated without dignity harms a resident's self-worth, mental health, and overall quality of life.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Apr 10, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (33)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 30, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
May 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
May 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Jul 19, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jul 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
May 31, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Apr 2, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have enough support staff to safely and effectively run its food and nutrition service.
Apr 2, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Apr 2, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Apr 2, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · from a complaint
Apr 2, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Apr 2, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Apr 2, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · from a complaint
Apr 2, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
Apr 2, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows.
Apr 2, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve meals and snacks at times that fit residents' needs, preferences, and requests, or did not offer nourishing alternatives for residents who want to eat outside scheduled meal times. · from a complaint
Apr 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Apr 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Apr 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · from a complaint
Apr 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Apr 2, 2024C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Apr 2, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Apr 2, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Dec 9, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 9, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Dec 9, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Dec 9, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Dec 9, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Dec 9, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.
Dec 9, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Dec 9, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Dec 9, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Dec 9, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (17 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2022100F
2024202J ▲
202530E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $24,470.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jul 19, 2024Fine$16,452
Apr 2, 2024Fine$8,018

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNorth Carolina avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.304.013.95bottom 21% in North Carolina; bottom 26% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.660.640.69top 31% in North Carolina; top 41% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.853.563.50bottom 16% in North Carolina; bottom 23% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.510.410.48top 23% in North Carolina; top 32% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)51.349.045.8bottom 45% in North Carolina; bottom 34% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)41.745.742.9top 42% in North Carolina; top 50% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.31, RN 0.66, weekend 2.86. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Saber Healthcare Holdings LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2020
Wrightsville Operations LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%11/15/2012
WWBV Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest100%09/30/2019
Joiner, BrianIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/29/2020
Nicoluzakis, GregoryIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2019
Saber Governance LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2019
Saber Healthcare Group LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/13/2013
SHG Management LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2019
SHG Management LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2019
Volpe, BenjaminIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2019
Volpe, BenjaminIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2019
Weisberg, WilliamIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2019
Weisberg, WilliamIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2019
Weisberg, WilliamIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/05/2026
Wiw Dynasty LLCOrganizationLimited Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
August Healthcare at Wilmington1.3 miWilmington, NC★★☆☆☆3/5
Peak Resources-Wilmington, INC1.4 miWilmington, NC★☆☆☆☆1/5
Cypress Pointe Rehabilitation Center2.2 miWilmington, NC★★★★★5/5
Trinity Grove3.0 miWilmington, NC★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Autumn Care of Myrtle Grove3.6 miWilmington, NC★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Brunswick Cove Nursing Center3.9 miWinnabow, NC★★☆☆☆3/5
Liberty Commons Rehabilitation Center5.6 miWilmington, NC★★☆☆☆2/5
Bradley Creek Health Center5.6 miWilmington, NC★★★★★5/5
Davis Health and Wellness Center at Cambridge Vill9.0 miWilmington, NC★★☆☆☆2/5
Northchase Nursing and Rehabilitation Center9.3 miWilmington, NC★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Wilmington →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 345557.