How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
3600 Old Boynton Road, Boynton Beach, FL 33436 (opens Google Maps) · Palm Beach County · (561) 736-9992· 120 certified beds · avg 114 residents/day · certified since Jan 16, 1992 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: EXCELSIOR CARE GROUP (33 facilities, chain avg rating 2.5★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 15 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint F-0684
The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. F-0677
The facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems. F-0805
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Mar 13, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Mar 13, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems. · F-0805 |
| Mar 13, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Mar 13, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Mar 13, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Mar 13, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Mar 13, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Mar 13, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| Nov 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs. · F-0770 |
| Jul 28, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Jul 28, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jul 28, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jul 28, 2022 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814 |
| Jul 28, 2022 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 8).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 5 | 0 | D |
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 8 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Florida avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.99 | 4.03 | 3.95 | top 39% in Florida; top 40% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.92 | 0.76 | 0.69 | top 23% in Florida; top 19% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.77 | 3.68 | 3.50 | top 30% in Florida; top 30% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.83 | 0.53 | 0.48 | top 14% in Florida; top 10% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 23.9 | 41.4 | 45.8 | top 11% in Florida; top 6% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 30.0 | 46.0 | 42.9 | top 21% in Florida; top 29% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.72, RN 0.86, weekend 3.51.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.72 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Heartland Nursing & Rehab Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fischel, Mayer | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 04/01/2023 |
| Flnho Capital Group LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 04/01/2023 |
| Heartland Boynton Intermediate Opco Holdco LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 04/01/2023 |
| Palm Beach Health Partners LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 04/01/2023 |
| Varghese, Mathew | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 04/01/2023 |
| George, Tia | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2023 |
| Landa, Benjamin | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2023 |
All 7 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Excelsior Care Group — 33 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 32 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boynton Beach Rehabilitation Center | 0.5 mi | Boynton Beach, FL | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Isles of Boynton Nursing and Rehab Center | 2.4 mi | Boynton Beach, FL | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Boulevard Rehabilitation Center | 2.7 mi | Boynton Beach, FL | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Hamlin Place of Boynton Beach | 3.1 mi | Lantana, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| VI at Lakeside Village | 3.7 mi | Lantana, FL | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Ventura Health and Rehabilitation Center | 4.4 mi | Boynton Beach, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Finnish-American Village | 4.5 mi | Lake Worth, FL | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Lake Worth Rehabilitation Center | 5.3 mi | Lake Worth, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Pine Trail Nursing and Rehab Center | 5.7 mi | Lake Worth, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Terraces of Lake Worth Care Center and Rehab | 5.7 mi | Lake Worth, FL | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Cascades Health and Rehabilitation Center | 6.1 mi | Delray Beach, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Medicana Nursing and Rehab Center | 6.2 mi | Lake Worth, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Palm Beach, FL — 54 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105755.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details