3737 N Garland Ave., Garland, TX 75044 (opens Google Maps) · Dallas County · (972) 495-7000· 132 certified beds · avg 94 residents/day · certified since Dec 8, 2004 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: PRIORITY MANAGEMENT (38 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Dec 7, 2023 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Nov 29, 2023 (Past Non-Compliance)
Showing the latest 3 of 15 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council. F-0565
The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. F-0585
The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). F-0628
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council. · F-0565 |
| Apr 10, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · F-0585 |
| Apr 10, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · F-0628 |
| Apr 10, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Dec 9, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint · F-0804 |
| Dec 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint · F-0602 |
| Dec 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · from a complaint · F-0644 |
| Jan 30, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint · F-0812 |
| Mar 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint · F-0657 |
| Dec 7, 2023 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Dec 7, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint · F-0812 |
| Dec 7, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Sep 19, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Sep 12, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Sep 12, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · from a complaint · F-0925 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 4).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 6 | 1 | J ▲ |
| 2024 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 4 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $10,345.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2023 | Fine | $10,345 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Texas avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.45 | 3.46 | 3.95 | top 40% in Texas; bottom 34% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.79 | 0.44 | 0.69 | top 7% in Texas; top 29% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.10 | 3.04 | 3.50 | top 34% in Texas; bottom 36% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.54 | 0.34 | 0.48 | top 10% in Texas; top 28% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 44.3 | 55.3 | 45.8 | top 31% in Texas; top 48% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 33.3 | 54.6 | 42.9 | top 20% in Texas; top 33% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.13, RN 0.71, weekend 2.82.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.13 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for The Parks at Garland Healthcare and Rehab. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bauder Family Investments, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 33% | 04/01/2024 |
| Bauder, Kelly | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 8% | 04/01/2024 |
| Bauder, Madison | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 8% | 04/01/2024 |
| Bauder, Parker | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 8% | 04/01/2024 |
| Boulware St James LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 33% | 04/01/2024 |
| Boulware, Douglas | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2024 |
| Boulware, Sandra | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2024 |
| Boulware, Thomas | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 8% | 04/01/2024 |
| Steven Boulware Family Investments LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 33% | 04/01/2024 |
| Walker, Katie | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 8% | 04/01/2024 |
| Bauder, Kelly | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2024 |
| Bauder, Madison | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2024 |
| Bauder, Parker | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2024 |
| Bauder, William | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2024 |
| Bauder, William | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2024 |
| Bauder, William | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2024 |
| Boulware, Steven | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2024 |
| Boulware, Steven | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2024 |
| Boulware, Thomas | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2024 |
| Bridgepointe Finanical Services, LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2024 |
Showing 20 of 34 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 14 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Priority Management — 38 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 37 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation Garland | 1.0 mi | Garland, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Beltline Healthcare Center | 1.7 mi | Garland, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Avir at Garland | 2.6 mi | Garland, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Pleasant Valley Healthcare and Rehabilitation Cent | 2.8 mi | Garland, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Lindan Park Care Center LP | 3.0 mi | Richardson, TX | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| San Remo | 3.3 mi | Richardson, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Remington Transitional Care of Richardson | 3.7 mi | Richardson, TX | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| The Plaza at Richardson | 4.5 mi | Richardson, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Collinwood Nursing and Rehabilitation | 4.6 mi | Plano, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Reserve at Richardson | 4.7 mi | Richardson, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Richardson Nursing and Rehabilitation | 5.1 mi | Richardson, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Advanced Health & Rehab Center of Garland | 5.6 mi | Garland, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Dallas, TX — 81 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 676039.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details