MichiganArmada

The Orchards at Armada

22600 Armada Ridge Road, Armada, MI 48005 · Macomb County · 67 certified beds · avg 64 residents/day · certified since Jun 25, 2003

Part of chain: THE ORCHARDS MICHIGAN (15 facilities, chain avg rating 1.9★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$15,887
Fines, last 3 years
3.56
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Dec 19, 2023 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Nov 7, 2023 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (17)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 6, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · from a complaint
Feb 25, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Jun 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jun 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them.
Jun 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 23, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · from a complaint
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows. · from a complaint
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Dec 19, 2023▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
May 9, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
May 9, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (9 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202331J ▲
202490F
202530D
202620D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $15,887.

DateTypeAmount / length
Dec 19, 2023Fine$15,887

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMichigan avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.564.323.95bottom 12% in Michigan; bottom 40% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.820.840.69top 44% in Michigan; top 26% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.193.793.50bottom 16% in Michigan; bottom 41% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.590.490.48top 28% in Michigan; top 24% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)0.044.145.8
RN turnover (%)0.039.242.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.18, RN 0.73, weekend 2.85. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Armada Opco Holdco LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%06/01/2022
Gutman, IsaacIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest06/01/2022
Hoffman, AlexanderIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest06/01/2022
Kornfeld, RobertIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest06/01/2022
Mi Opco Holdco LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest06/01/2022
Taub, JacobIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest06/01/2022
Fisherman, ZalmanIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2022
Henrikson, DonaldIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2022
Kornfeld, RobertIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2022

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Wellbridge of Romeo6.8 miRomeo, MI★★★★★5/5
Medilodge of Richmond6.9 miRichmond, MI★★★★☆4/5
Orchard Grove Health Campus7.0 miRomeo, MI★★★★★4/5
The Village of East Harbor13.3 miChesterfield Township, MI★★★☆☆3/5
Michigan Veterans Home of Chesterfield Township13.7 miChesterfield Township, MI★★★★★5/5
Shelby Crossing Health Campus14.7 miShelby Townhip, MI★★★★★5/5
Regency at Shelby Township14.9 miShelby Township, MI★★★★☆4/5
Shelby Health and Rehabilitation Center15.1 miShelby Township, MI★★★★☆3/5
Martha T Berry MCF15.6 miMount Clemems, MI★★★★☆4/5
Medilodge of Shoreline15.8 miSterling Heights, MI★★★☆☆3/5
Lakeside Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center16.0 miSterling Heights, MI—/5SFF
Regency Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center16.4 miUtica, MI★★☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Armada →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 235609.