How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
43533 Elizabeth Road, Mount Clemems, MI 48043 (opens Google Maps) · Macomb County · (586) 469-5265· 217 certified beds · avg 208 residents/day · certified since Apr 22, 1968 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Nov 10, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Dec 8, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 17 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. F-0584
The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. F-0657
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. F-0684
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Apr 2, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Apr 2, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Apr 2, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Nov 10, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jan 29, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Jan 29, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Jan 29, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jan 29, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Jan 29, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jan 29, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| Jan 29, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Sep 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint · F-0602 |
| Nov 15, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Nov 15, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint · F-0558 |
| Nov 15, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Nov 15, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint · F-0921 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 4).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 4 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 8 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 4 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Michigan avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.54 | 4.32 | 3.95 | top 11% in Michigan; top 7% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.66 | 0.84 | 0.69 | bottom 35% in Michigan; top 41% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.38 | 3.79 | 3.50 | top 16% in Michigan; top 14% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.15 | 0.49 | 0.48 | bottom 5% in Michigan; bottom 5% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 44.5 | 44.1 | 45.8 | top 49% in Michigan; top 49% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 33.3 | 39.2 | 42.9 | top 38% in Michigan; top 33% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.05, RN 0.60, weekend 4.00.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (5.05 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Martha T Berry MCF. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Government - County
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beg, Mirza | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2011 |
| Beg, Mirza | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/10/2025 |
| Brown, Ralph | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2017 |
| Concept Rehab, INC. | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/20/2016 |
| Evans, Kevin | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2016 |
| Evans, Kevin | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2016 |
| Evans, Kevin | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/10/2025 |
| Flynn, Courtney | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/25/2024 |
| Luyeho, Christine | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2024 |
| Macomb County Human Services Board-An Agency of Macomb County | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2010 |
| Macomb County Human Services Board-An Agency of Macomb County | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2010 |
| Morrison Management Specialists INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2016 |
| Morrison Management Specialists INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2016 |
| Thompson, Patrick | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2016 |
All 14 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lakepointe Senior Care and Rehabilitation Center | 3.0 mi | Clinton Township, MI | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Harmony Village of Clinton | 3.9 mi | Clinton Township, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Church of Christ Care Center | 4.3 mi | Clinton Township, MI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Michigan Veterans Home of Chesterfield Township | 4.3 mi | Chesterfield Township, MI | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Medilodge of Shoreline | 4.4 mi | Sterling Heights, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Lakeside Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 5.2 mi | Sterling Heights, MI | —/5 | SFF | |
| Shelby Health and Rehabilitation Center | 5.6 mi | Shelby Township, MI | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Shelby Crossing Health Campus | 5.6 mi | Shelby Townhip, MI | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Sterling Heig | 5.9 mi | Sterling Heights, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Fraser Villa | 6.2 mi | Fraser, MI | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Medilodge of Sterling Heights | 6.6 mi | Sterling Heights, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Village of East Harbor | 7.2 mi | Chesterfield Township, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Macomb, MI — 30 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 235155.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details