MichiganClinton Township

Church of Christ Care Center

23575 15 Mile Rd, Clinton Township, MI 48035 · Macomb County · 129 certified beds · avg 113 residents/day · certified since Feb 24, 2006

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
3
Serious findings on record
$40,940
Fines, last 3 years
3.69
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Aug 20, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Sep 23, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Aug 1, 2024 · F-0686 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Aug 23, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 2, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 25, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (29)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Apr 15, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Aug 20, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Aug 20, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 20, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Aug 20, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Aug 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Aug 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have.
Aug 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Aug 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Aug 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Sep 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Aug 1, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Aug 1, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Aug 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Aug 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' individual preferences, choices, values, and beliefs in their daily life and care.
Aug 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Aug 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
May 2, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
May 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · from a complaint
Feb 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint
Jun 14, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Jun 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Jun 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jun 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jun 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Jun 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Jun 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.
Jun 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 9).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202380E
2024102G ▲
202591G ▲
202620D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $40,940, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Aug 20, 2025Fine$17,345
Aug 20, 2025Payment Denial12 days from Sep 17, 2025
Aug 1, 2024Fine$23,595

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMichigan avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.694.323.95bottom 20% in Michigan; bottom 46% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.470.840.69bottom 16% in Michigan; bottom 33% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.493.793.50bottom 42% in Michigan; top 42% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.350.490.48bottom 37% in Michigan; bottom 43% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)54.244.145.8bottom 21% in Michigan; bottom 27% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)35.739.242.9top 47% in Michigan; top 39% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.58, RN 0.46, weekend 3.39. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Church related

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Almasri, BasemIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/07/2009
Almasri, BasemIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/07/2009
Arnett, DebraIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/27/2018
Hardyfoster, LenoraIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE02/13/2020
Hardyfoster, LenoraIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/13/2020
Jenema, PattiIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2021
Jenema, PattiIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2021
Messier, MichaelIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/14/2006
Olafsson, JanetIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/19/2022
Olafsson, JanetIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/22/2019
Stewart, DavidIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/22/2019
Stewart, DavidIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/22/2019
Stoinski, JenelIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/02/2025
Stoinski, JenelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/03/2025
Swantek, JohnIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/14/2006
Wilson, MarkIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/14/2006

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Lakepointe Senior Care and Rehabilitation Center1.3 miClinton Township, MI★★★★★5/5
Fraser Villa4.2 miFraser, MI★★★★★5/5
Martha T Berry MCF4.3 miMount Clemems, MI★★★★☆4/5
Harmony Village of Clinton4.4 miClinton Township, MI★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Shorepointe Nursing Center5.0 miSt. Clair Shores, MI★★★☆☆3/5
Medilodge of Sterling Heights5.6 miSterling Heights, MI★★☆☆☆2/5
The Orchards at Roseville5.7 miRoseville, MI★☆☆☆☆2/5
Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Sterling Heig6.1 miSterling Heights, MI★★★☆☆2/5
Regency at St. Clair Shores6.7 miSt. Clair Shores, MI★★★★☆4/5
Medilodge of Shoreline6.8 miSterling Heights, MI★★★☆☆3/5
Michigan Veterans Home of Chesterfield Township7.3 miChesterfield Township, MI★★★★★5/5
The Orchards at Warren7.3 miWarren, MI★☆☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Clinton Township →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 235619.