The Village of East Harbor

Name: The Village of East Harbor
Address: 33875 Kiely Drive, Chesterfield Township, MI, 48047, US
Telephone: 5867256030

33875 Kiely Drive, Chesterfield Township, MI 48047 · Macomb County · 102 certified beds · avg 89 residents/day · certified since Aug 21, 1992

3/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

$15,593

Fines, last 3 years

4.47

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Oct 4, 2023 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Oct 12, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (17)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Dec 22, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Apr 2, 2025	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · from a complaint
Apr 2, 2025	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Apr 2, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Apr 2, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Apr 2, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Apr 18, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences.
Apr 18, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council.
Apr 18, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Apr 18, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Oct 4, 2023	▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Mar 29, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Mar 29, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Mar 29, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Mar 29, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Mar 29, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Mar 29, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (4 → 5).

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2023	7	1	J ▲
2024	4	0	E
2025	6	0	F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $15,593.

Date	Type	Amount / length
Oct 4, 2023	Fine	$15,593

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Michigan avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	4.47	4.32	3.95	top 30% in Michigan; top 24% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.71	0.84	0.69	bottom 44% in Michigan; top 35% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	3.85	3.79	3.50	top 34% in Michigan; top 27% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.26	0.49	0.48	bottom 20% in Michigan; bottom 24% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	43.4	44.1	45.8	top 46% in Michigan; top 46% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	52.6	39.2	42.9	bottom 25% in Michigan; bottom 32% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.17, RN 0.66, weekend 3.60. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Church related

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Myers, Roger	Individual	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	—	12/08/1993
Presbyterian Village East	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	—	12/08/1993
Presbyterian Villages of Michigan	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	—	12/08/1993
Miller, David	Individual	W-2 Managing Employee	NOT APPLICABLE	07/01/2007
Miller, David	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	04/07/1987

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
"How many hours a day is a registered nurse physically in the building, including weekends?"
"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
"How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
"Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
"How are residents and families included in care plan meetings, and how often do those meetings happen?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Michigan Veterans Home of Chesterfield Township	2.9 mi	Chesterfield Township, MI	★★★★★	5/5
Martha T Berry MCF	7.2 mi	Mount Clemems, MI	★★★★☆	4/5
Lakepointe Senior Care and Rehabilitation Center	8.7 mi	Clinton Township, MI	★★★★★	5/5
Medilodge of Richmond	9.4 mi	Richmond, MI	★★★★☆	4/5
Church of Christ Care Center	9.8 mi	Clinton Township, MI	★☆☆☆☆	2/5	abuse
Medilodge of Shoreline	11.1 mi	Sterling Heights, MI	★★★☆☆	3/5
Harmony Village of Clinton	11.1 mi	Clinton Township, MI	★★☆☆☆	2/5	abuse
Shelby Crossing Health Campus	11.5 mi	Shelby Townhip, MI	★★★★★	5/5
Shelby Health and Rehabilitation Center	11.7 mi	Shelby Township, MI	★★★★☆	3/5
Lakeside Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	11.8 mi	Sterling Heights, MI		—/5	SFF
Fraser Villa	13.1 mi	Fraser, MI	★★★★★	5/5
Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Sterling Heig	13.1 mi	Sterling Heights, MI	★★★☆☆	2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Chesterfield Township →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 235528.

The Care File

Visit checklist — The Village of East Harbor

33875 Kiely Drive, Chesterfield Township, MI 48047 · 5867256030

Health inspection rating 3/5 · CMS overall 3/5· Fines (3y): $15,593

Most serious findings on record:

▲ Oct 4, 2023 (F-0689, Immediate jeopardy, one-off): The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
☐ "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
☐ "How many hours a day is a registered nurse physically in the building, including weekends?"
☐ "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
☐ "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
☐ "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
☐ "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
☐ "How are residents and families included in care plan meetings, and how often do those meetings happen?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 235528 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)