Regency at Shelby Township
7401 22 Mile Road, Shelby Township, MI 48317 · Macomb County · 116 certified beds · avg 110 residents/day · certified since Nov 12, 2015 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: CIENA HEALTHCARE/LAUREL HEALTH CARE (81 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jul 26, 2023 · F-0600
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Aug 16, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
All citations in the current public record (25)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint |
| Nov 20, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Nov 20, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. |
| Nov 20, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Sep 12, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. |
| Sep 12, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Sep 12, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint |
| Sep 12, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. |
| Sep 12, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Sep 12, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| Sep 12, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint |
| Sep 12, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. |
| Sep 12, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Sep 12, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide proper care for residents with a colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy — surgical openings in the abdomen that let waste leave the body into a pouch. These require regular, skilled attention to stay clean and healthy. |
| Sep 12, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety. |
| Jul 26, 2023 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. |
| Jul 26, 2023 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Jul 26, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. |
| Jul 26, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. |
| Jul 26, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. |
| Jul 26, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Jul 26, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Jul 26, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. |
| Jul 26, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. |
| Jul 26, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (11 → 3).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 10 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2024 | 11 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Michigan avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.77 | 4.32 | 3.95 | bottom 26% in Michigan; top 50% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.72 | 0.84 | 0.69 | bottom 45% in Michigan; top 35% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.19 | 3.79 | 3.50 | bottom 16% in Michigan; bottom 41% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.38 | 0.49 | 0.48 | bottom 43% in Michigan; bottom 49% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 50.8 | 44.1 | 45.8 | bottom 29% in Michigan; bottom 35% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 44.4 | 39.2 | 42.9 | bottom 40% in Michigan; bottom 45% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.79, RN 0.72, weekend 3.20. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ciena Michigan Operations Group LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2022 |
| Mohammad a Qazi Living Trust Dated 09/26/97 | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2022 |
| Qazi, Mohammad | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2022 |
| Alatassi, Malaz | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Ciena Healthcare Management INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/12/2015 |
| Ciena Healthcare Management INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/25/2025 |
| Deutsch, Neal | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/07/2015 |
| Gardina, Anna | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/07/2015 |
| Khan, Anis | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/12/2015 |
| Khan, Anis | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/12/2015 |
| Khan, Anis | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/12/2015 |
| Maze, Rebecca | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/26/2015 |
| Maze, Rebecca | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/26/2015 |
| Mohammad Qazi 2022 Children's Trust Uad 5-4-2022 | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2022 |
| Qazi, Mohammad | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/12/2015 |
| Qazi, Mohammad | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/12/2015 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "Can you show me the call buttons in the bathrooms and bathing areas, and tell me your average response time when one is pressed?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regency Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 1.9 mi | Utica, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Shelby Crossing Health Campus | 2.7 mi | Shelby Townhip, MI | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Shelby Health and Rehabilitation Center | 2.7 mi | Shelby Township, MI | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Lakeside Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 3.5 mi | Sterling Heights, MI | —/5 | SFF | |
| Medilodge of Shoreline | 4.2 mi | Sterling Heights, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Wellbridge of Rochester Hills | 4.8 mi | Rochester Hills, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Bellbrook | 5.6 mi | Rochester Hills, MI | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Troy | 6.0 mi | Troy, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Sterling Heig | 6.1 mi | Sterling Heights, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Springs at Rochester Hills Rehab and Nursing C | 6.4 mi | Rochester Hills, MI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Harmony Village of Clinton | 6.7 mi | Clinton Township, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Medilodge of Sterling Heights | 7.7 mi | Sterling Heights, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
All facilities in Shelby Township →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 235710.