How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
2626 Walker Rd, Chattanooga, TN 37421 (opens Google Maps) · Hamilton County · (423) 490-1599· 444 certified beds · avg 382 residents/day · certified since May 26, 1976 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 15 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. F-0657
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. F-0695
The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. F-0814
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Jul 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Jul 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814 |
| Jul 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jul 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921 |
| Jun 9, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| Jun 9, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Jun 9, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Jun 9, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jul 31, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Jul 31, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jul 31, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| Jul 31, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · F-0725 |
| Jul 31, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760 |
| Jul 31, 2019 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not properly notify residents about the balance of money it holds for them, or failed to return those funds when a resident was discharged, evicted, or died. · F-0569 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (4 → 5).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 6 | 0 | D |
| 2022 | 4 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 5 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Tennessee avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.54 | 3.62 | 3.95 | top 45% in Tennessee; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.41 | 0.57 | 0.69 | bottom 27% in Tennessee; bottom 24% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.02 | 3.15 | 3.50 | top 50% in Tennessee; bottom 32% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.25 | 0.39 | 0.48 | bottom 24% in Tennessee; bottom 21% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 44.9 | 48.9 | 45.8 | top 40% in Tennessee; top 50% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 30.8 | 43.2 | 42.9 | top 28% in Tennessee; top 30% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.83, RN 0.44, weekend 3.27.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.83 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for The Health Center at Standifer Place. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Covenant Health Services LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 10/01/2013 |
| Strawn, John | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 100% | 10/01/2013 |
| Boozer, David | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2015 |
| Boozer, David | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/16/2025 |
| Breakey, Angela | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2015 |
| Covenant Health Services LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2013 |
| Health, Educational, and Housing Facility Board of the City of Chattan | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/14/2000 |
| Pendley, Bruce | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/07/2009 |
| Pendley, Bruce | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/16/2025 |
| Rivercity Staffing, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2013 |
| Standifer Place Properties LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/07/2025 |
| Strawn, John | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2013 |
| Strawn, John | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2013 |
| Tennessee Healthcare Advisors, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2007 |
All 14 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chattanooga Health and Rehab Center | 2.0 mi | Chattanooga, TN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Life Care Center of Ooltewah | 4.8 mi | Ooltewah, TN | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Life Care Center of Collegedale | 5.1 mi | Collegedale, TN | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Life Care Center of East Ridge | 6.0 mi | Chattanooga, TN | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| NHC Healthcare, Chattanooga | 7.0 mi | Chattanooga, TN | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Life Care Center of Hixson | 8.4 mi | Hixson, TN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Siskin Subacute West | 9.0 mi | Chattanooga, TN | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| NHC Healthcare Ft Oglethorpe | 9.1 mi | Fort Oglethorpe, GA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Pruitthealth - Fort Oglethorpe | 9.3 mi | Fort Oglethorpe, GA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Center for Advanced Rehab at Parkside, the | 10.6 mi | Rossville, GA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| NHC Healthcare Rossville | 10.8 mi | Rossville, GA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Life Care Center of Red Bank | 10.9 mi | Chattanooga, TN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Hamilton, TN — 11 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 445111.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details