How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
The Grand Rehabilitation and Nursing at South Poin
1 Long Beach Road, Island Park, NY 11558 (opens Google Maps) · Nassau County · (516) 432-0300· 185 certified beds · avg 179 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1967 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: THE GRAND HEALTHCARE (16 facilities, chain avg rating 1.8★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jun 5, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.30
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 21 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint F-0609
The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. F-0550
The facility did not honor residents' right to share a room with their spouse or a roommate of their choosing, or moved residents to a different room without written notice beforehand. · from a complaint F-0559
View all 21 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Jun 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Jun 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to share a room with their spouse or a roommate of their choosing, or moved residents to a different room without written notice beforehand. · from a complaint · F-0559 |
| Jun 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Jun 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jun 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Jun 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
| Jun 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety. · F-0740 |
| Jun 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jun 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jun 5, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Jun 5, 2025 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies. · F-0838 |
| Oct 5, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Oct 5, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580 |
| Oct 5, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · from a complaint · F-0604 |
| Oct 5, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Oct 5, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · from a complaint · F-0756 |
| Oct 5, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · from a complaint · F-0758 |
| Oct 5, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Oct 5, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Aug 11, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (8 → 10).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2021
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 12
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2023 | 8 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 12 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityNew York averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.30
New York average: 3.58
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.50
New York average: 0.68
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.01
New York average: 3.13
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New York avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.30 | 3.58 | 3.95 | bottom 43% in New York; bottom 26% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.50 | 0.68 | 0.69 | bottom 37% in New York; bottom 38% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.01 | 3.13 | 3.50 | top 49% in New York; bottom 32% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.32 | 0.48 | 0.48 | bottom 44% in New York; bottom 36% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 28.8 | 40.3 | 45.8 | top 25% in New York; top 12% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 21.7 | 39.8 | 42.9 | top 13% in New York; top 17% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.29, RN 0.50, weekend 3.00.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.29 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for The Grand Rehabilitation and Nursing at South Poin. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Partnership
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strauss, Jeremy | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 95% | 01/01/2019 |
| Strauss, Meryl | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 5% | 01/01/2019 |
| Rogers, Eric | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Rogers, Eric | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Strauss, Jeremy | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Strauss, Jeremy | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
All 6 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain The Grand Healthcare — 16 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- The Grand Rehabilitation and Nursing at Utica — Utica, NY · overall 1/5SFF
- Bridge View Nursing Home — Whitestone, NY · overall 4/5
- Delaware Oaks Center for Rehabilitation and Nursin — Buffalo, NY · overall 2/5abuse
- Fulton Commons Care Center INC — East Meadow, NY · overall 2/5
- Mayfair Care Center — Hempstead, NY · overall 1/5
- The Grand Rehabilitation and Nrsg at Chittenango — Chittenango, NY · overall 1/5
- The Grand Rehabilitation and Nrsg at Guilderland — Altamont, NY · overall 1/5SFF
- The Grand Rehabilitation and Nrsg at River Valley — Poughkeepsie, NY · overall 2/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 15 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
- "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
- "How do you handle room assignments and roommate requests, and do residents get advance written notice before any move?"
- "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How do you decide when a feeding tube is truly needed, and how do staff care for residents who have one?"
- "Where do you post your daily staffing numbers, and can I see today's?"
- "What mental health services do you provide on-site, and who delivers them?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 29% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 146 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long Beach Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 0.5 mi | Long Beach, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Park Avenue Extended Care Facility | 1.0 mi | Long Beach, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Beach Terrace Care Center | 1.8 mi | Long Beach, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Grandell Rehabilitation and Nu | 1.8 mi | Long Beach, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Oceanside Care Center INC | 2.8 mi | Oceanside, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Lynbrook Restorative Therapy and Nursing | 3.4 mi | Lunbrook, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| The Five Towns Premier Rehabilitation & Nursing Ce | 3.5 mi | Woodmere, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Mount Sinai South Nassau T C U | 3.8 mi | Oceanside, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| The Grand Pavilion for Rehab & Nursing at Rockvill | 4.3 mi | Rockville Centre, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Rockville Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, | 4.3 mi | Rockville Center, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Oceanview Nursing & Rehabilitation Care Center | 4.7 mi | Far Rockaway, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| West Lawrence Care Center, L L C | 4.7 mi | Far Rockaway, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Nassau, NY — 36 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Townhouse Center for Rehabilitation & Nursing — Uniondale, NY · overall 3/5
- White Oaks Rehabilitation and Nursing Center — Woodbury, NY · overall 3/5
- Woodbury Heights Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Woodbury, NY · overall 1/5
- A Holly Patterson Extended Care Facility — Uniondale, NY · overall 1/5abuse
- Belair Care Center INC — Bellmore, NY · overall 5/5
- Central Island Healthcare — Plainview, NY · overall 4/5
- Daleview Care Center — East Farmingdale, NY · overall 4/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335162.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).