How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
The Club at Lake Gibson
855 Carpenters Way, Lakeland, FL 33809 (opens Google Maps) · Polk County · (863) 213-3335· 120 certified beds · avg 120 residents/day · certified since May 6, 2021 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: GOLD FL TRUST II (36 facilities, chain avg rating 3.4★)
2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jan 30, 2025
3
Serious findings on record
most recent May 8, 2026
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.43
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · May 8, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · May 8, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jun 22, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · May 8, 2026 · F-0726 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · May 8, 2026 · F-0726 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Why it matters: Undertrained caregivers are more likely to miss warning signs and make care mistakes.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jun 22, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Dec 2, 2022 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Dec 2, 2022 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Dec 31, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 21 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint F-0726
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
View all 21 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2026 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| May 8, 2026 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint · F-0726 |
| Jan 30, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jan 30, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Oct 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · from a complaint · F-0552 |
| Oct 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · from a complaint · F-0694 |
| Oct 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Jul 18, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint · F-0761 |
| Dec 2, 2022 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Dec 2, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · F-0725 |
| Dec 2, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Dec 2, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Dec 2, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. · F-0637 |
| Dec 2, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Dec 2, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · F-0676 |
| Dec 2, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
| Dec 2, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Dec 2, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| Dec 2, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Dec 2, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care. · F-0791 |
| Dec 2, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · F-0867 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (13 → 2).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2022
All citations: 13
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2024
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 2
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 13 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2024 | 4 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 2 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 2 | 2 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityFlorida averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.43
Florida average: 4.03
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.51
Florida average: 0.76
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.08
Florida average: 3.68
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Florida avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.43 | 4.03 | 3.95 | bottom 10% in Florida; bottom 33% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.51 | 0.76 | 0.69 | bottom 25% in Florida; bottom 40% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.08 | 3.68 | 3.50 | bottom 6% in Florida; bottom 35% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.47 | 0.53 | 0.48 | top 46% in Florida; top 36% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 54.7 | 41.4 | 45.8 | bottom 18% in Florida; bottom 26% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 56.5 | 46.0 | 42.9 | bottom 29% in Florida; bottom 26% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.54, RN 0.53, weekend 3.18.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.54 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for The Club at Lake Gibson. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Buah MD Trust | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2024 |
| Copper FL Trust II | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2024 |
| Gold FL Trust II | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2024 |
| Katz, Aharon | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 10% | 10/01/2024 |
| Lake Gibson SNF Holdco LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2024 |
| Silver FL Trust II | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2024 |
| Apex Global Solutions LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2024 |
| Asure Wound Solutions LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/26/2025 |
| Bank Hapoalim B.M. | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2024 |
| Bank Hapoalim B.M. | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2024 |
| Chaim Gitelis Do PC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2024 |
| Ellenbogen, Moss | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/26/2025 |
| Forvis Mazars LLP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2024 |
| Healthlink Diagnostic Laboratories INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2024 |
| Kamara, Marie | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/05/2025 |
| Kamara, Marie | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/05/2025 |
| Kamara, Marie | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/31/2024 |
| Katz, Aharon | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2024 |
| Lake Gibson SNF Holdco LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2024 |
| Lion Care Services LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2024 |
Showing 20 of 26 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 6 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Gold FL Trust II — 36 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- The Lodge Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center — Ocala, FL · overall 4/5
- Unity Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center — Miami, FL · overall 5/5
- Viera Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center — Viera, FL · overall 3/5
- Villa Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center — Deland, FL · overall 5/5
- Village Place Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center — Port Charlotte, FL · overall 2/5
- Villages Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center, the — Lady Lake, FL · overall 2/5
- Wilton Manors Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center — Wilton Manors, FL · overall 4/5
- Woodland Grove Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center — Jacksonville, FL · overall 5/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 35 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How do you verify that your nurses and aides have the skills to care for residents with needs like my family member's?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "How do you explain health changes and treatment options to residents and their families?"
- "Who on your staff manages IV therapy, and what training and monitoring is in place?"
- "What is your nurse and aide staffing ratio on each shift, including nights and weekends?"
- "How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Florida midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 55% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 26 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 25 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manor at Carpenters, the | 0.0 mi | Lakeland, FL | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Wedgewood Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center | 0.0 mi | Lakeland, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Valencia Hills Health and Rehabilitation Center | 0.6 mi | Lakeland, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Breezy Hills Rehab and Care Center | 1.5 mi | Lakeland, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Vivo Healthcare Lakeland | 2.2 mi | Lakeland, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Lakeland Hills Center | 2.3 mi | Lakeland, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Charming Lakes Rehab | 2.5 mi | Lakeland, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Florida Presbyterian Homes INC | 4.7 mi | Lakeland, FL | ★★★★★ | 3/5 | |
| Bridgewalk on Harden Health and Rehabilitation, LL | 6.4 mi | Lakeland, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Highlands Lake Center | 8.2 mi | Lakeland, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Solaris Healthcare Plant City | 9.2 mi | Plant City, FL | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Scott Lake Health and Rehabilitation Center | 10.2 mi | Lakeland, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Polk, FL — 25 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Vivo Healthcare Winter Haven — Winter Haven, FL · overall 1/5
- Winter Haven Health and Rehabilitation Center — Winter Haven, FL · overall 2/5
- Astoria Health and Rehabilitation Center — Winter Haven, FL · overall 3/5
- Bartow Center — Bartow, FL · overall 2/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 106146.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).