FloridaOcala

The Lodge Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center

635 SE 17th Street, Ocala, FL 34471 · Marion County · 99 certified beds · avg 91 residents/day · certified since Jun 1, 1982

Part of chain: GOLD FL TRUST II (36 facilities, chain avg rating 3.4★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$17,737
Fines, last 3 years
3.58
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Feb 27, 2025 · F-0806

The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.

Why it matters: Ignoring allergies can be dangerous, and ignoring preferences leads residents to eat less and lose weight.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Mar 31, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (21)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 10, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jun 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jun 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jun 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jun 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 27, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.
Feb 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Feb 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Feb 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Feb 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Feb 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Feb 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Nov 16, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Nov 16, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Nov 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Nov 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Nov 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (10 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202350E
202410D
2025101J ▲
202650E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $17,737.

DateTypeAmount / length
Feb 27, 2025Fine$17,737

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityFlorida avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.584.033.95bottom 22% in Florida; bottom 40% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.430.760.69bottom 13% in Florida; bottom 27% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.193.683.50bottom 13% in Florida; bottom 41% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.380.530.48bottom 38% in Florida; bottom 49% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)44.641.445.8bottom 42% in Florida; top 49% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)87.546.042.9bottom 1% in Florida; bottom 3% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.72, RN 0.45, weekend 3.32. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
FL Master Opco Holdco LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest100%07/27/2022
The Lodge SNF Holdco LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%03/23/2022
Oliver, TonyaIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE07/27/2022
Shelby, JackIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/27/2022

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Avante at Ocala, INC0.5 miOcala, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5
Ocala Health and Rehabilitation Center0.7 miOcala, FL★★★★☆3/5
Aviata at Arbor Springs0.9 miOcala, FL★★☆☆☆1/5
Palm Garden of Ocala2.7 miOcala, FL★★★★☆3/5
Life Care Center of Ocala3.0 miOcala, FL★★★★★4/5
Hawthorne Center for Rehabilitation and Healing of3.2 miOcala, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5
Ocala Oaks Rehabilitation Center3.6 miOcala, FL★★★★☆3/5
Timberridge Nursing & Rehabilitation Center11.9 miOcala, FL★★★☆☆2/5
Bridgewater Park Health & Rehabilitation Center12.5 miOcala, FL★★★★☆3/5
Club Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center at the V15.4 miThe Villages, FL★★★☆☆3/5
Buffalo Crossings Healthcare & Rehabilitation Cen17.9 miThe Villages, FL★★★★★4/5
Freedom Pointe Health Center18.5 miThe Villages, FL★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Ocala →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105196.