FloridaLakeland

The Club at Lake Gibson

855 Carpenters Way, Lakeland, FL 33809 · Polk County · 120 certified beds · avg 120 residents/day · certified since May 6, 2021

Part of chain: GOLD FL TRUST II (36 facilities, chain avg rating 3.4★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
3
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.43
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 8, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jun 22, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 8, 2026 · F-0726 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.

Why it matters: Undertrained caregivers are more likely to miss warning signs and make care mistakes.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jun 22, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Dec 2, 2022 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Dec 31, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (21)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 8, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
May 8, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint
Jan 30, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · from a complaint
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · from a complaint
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Jul 18, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Dec 2, 2022▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Dec 2, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Dec 2, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 2, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Dec 2, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
Dec 2, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Dec 2, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have.
Dec 2, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Dec 2, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Dec 2, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Dec 2, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Dec 2, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.
Dec 2, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (13 → 2).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2022131G ▲
202440F
202520E
202622G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityFlorida avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.434.033.95bottom 10% in Florida; bottom 33% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.510.760.69bottom 25% in Florida; bottom 40% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.083.683.50bottom 6% in Florida; bottom 35% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.470.530.48top 46% in Florida; top 36% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)54.741.445.8bottom 18% in Florida; bottom 26% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)56.546.042.9bottom 29% in Florida; bottom 26% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.54, RN 0.53, weekend 3.18. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Buah MD TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
Copper FL Trust IIOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
Gold FL Trust IIOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
Katz, AharonIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10%10/01/2024
Lake Gibson SNF Holdco LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
Silver FL Trust IIOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
Apex Global Solutions LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
Asure Wound Solutions LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/26/2025
Bank Hapoalim B.M.Organization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
Bank Hapoalim B.M.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
Chaim Gitelis Do PCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
Ellenbogen, MossIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/26/2025
Forvis Mazars LLPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
Healthlink Diagnostic Laboratories INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
Kamara, MarieIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/05/2025
Kamara, MarieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/05/2025
Kamara, MarieIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/31/2024
Katz, AharonIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
Lake Gibson SNF Holdco LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
Lion Care Services LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Manor at Carpenters, the0.0 miLakeland, FL★★★★☆4/5
Wedgewood Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center0.0 miLakeland, FL★★☆☆☆3/5
Valencia Hills Health and Rehabilitation Center0.6 miLakeland, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5
Breezy Hills Rehab and Care Center1.5 miLakeland, FL★★☆☆☆2/5
Vivo Healthcare Lakeland2.2 miLakeland, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5
Lakeland Hills Center2.3 miLakeland, FL★★☆☆☆1/5
Charming Lakes Rehab2.5 miLakeland, FL★★☆☆☆2/5
Florida Presbyterian Homes INC4.7 miLakeland, FL★★★★★3/5
Bridgewalk on Harden Health and Rehabilitation, LL6.4 miLakeland, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5
Highlands Lake Center8.2 miLakeland, FL★★☆☆☆2/5
Solaris Healthcare Plant City9.2 miPlant City, FL★★★★★5/5
Scott Lake Health and Rehabilitation Center10.2 miLakeland, FL★★☆☆☆1/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Lakeland →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 106146.