How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
2150 St. Paul Street, Rochester, NY 14621 (opens Google Maps) · Monroe County · (585) 342-5540· 28 certified beds · avg 26 residents/day · certified since Jan 3, 2001 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 24 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. F-0550
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. F-0584
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jan 16, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Jan 16, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Jan 16, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jan 16, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Nov 14, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Nov 14, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Nov 14, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Nov 14, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Nov 14, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Nov 14, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803 |
| Nov 14, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's bedrooms did not give residents visual privacy — such as curtains or dividers — when privacy is needed. · F-0914 |
| Nov 14, 2024 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
| Nov 14, 2024 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Feb 16, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Feb 16, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · from a complaint · F-0925 |
| May 10, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · F-0727 |
| May 10, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| May 10, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months. · F-0868 |
| May 10, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| May 10, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| May 10, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| May 10, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| May 10, 2023 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (9 → 5).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 8 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 11 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 5 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New York avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.76 | 3.58 | 3.95 | top 35% in New York; bottom 50% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.53 | 0.68 | 0.69 | bottom 41% in New York; bottom 42% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.43 | 3.13 | 3.50 | top 27% in New York; top 46% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.59 | 0.48 | 0.48 | top 23% in New York; top 24% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 76.2 | 40.3 | 45.8 | bottom 2% in New York; bottom 3% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 75.0 | 39.8 | 42.9 | bottom 4% in New York; bottom 9% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.81, RN 0.53, weekend 3.47.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.81 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for The Brook at High Falls Nursing Home and Rehabilit. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Individual
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grinspan, Aryeh | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 25% | 10/11/2019 |
| Mayer, Abraham | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 25% | 10/11/2019 |
| Mayer, Giorgio | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 50% | 10/11/2019 |
| Fried, Joel | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/30/2025 |
| Green, Wolf | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/30/2025 |
| Grinspan, Aryeh | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/11/2019 |
| Ilyagu, Mark | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/25/2023 |
| Ilyagu, Mark | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2025 |
| JW Brook Propco LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/30/2025 |
| JW Brook Propco LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/30/2025 |
| Licht, Tzvi | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2025 |
| Omega Business Services LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/13/2023 |
| Omega Business Services LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2025 |
| Rubin, Baila | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2025 |
| Rubin, Shoshana | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2025 |
| Wettenstein, David | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| Wettenstein, David | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/13/2025 |
All 17 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| St. Ann's Community | 1.7 mi | Rochester, NY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| The Pearl Nursing Center of Rochester | 1.8 mi | Rochester, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Kirkhaven | 3.2 mi | Rochester, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Lilac Manor Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 3.3 mi | Rochester, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Unity Living Center | 3.4 mi | Rochester, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Church Home of the Protestant Episcopal Church | 3.8 mi | Rochester, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Hamilton Manor Nursing Home | 4.2 mi | Rochester, NY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Park Ridge Nursing Home | 4.2 mi | Rochester, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| St. John's Health Care Corporation | 4.5 mi | Rochester, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Latta Road Nursing Home West | 4.7 mi | Rochester, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Latta Road Nursing Home East | 4.7 mi | Rochester, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Blossom Health Care Center INC. | 4.9 mi | Rochester, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Monroe, NY — 32 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335825.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details