New YorkRochester

St. Ann's Community

1500 Portland Avenue, Rochester, NY 14621 · Monroe County · 470 certified beds · avg 366 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1967

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$55,495
Fines, last 3 years
4.63
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jan 7, 2025 · F-0686 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Feb 20, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (13)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 7, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Apr 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Apr 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Apr 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 22, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Sep 22, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Sep 22, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Sep 22, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility was not properly licensed, or did not operate in compliance with federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and accepted professional standards.
Jan 7, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Jan 7, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Jan 7, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jan 7, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jan 7, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (4 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202050D
202240E
202430D
202511G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $55,495.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jan 7, 2025Fine$51,301
Aug 28, 2023Fine$4,194

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew York avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.633.583.95top 10% in New York; top 20% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.540.680.69bottom 44% in New York; bottom 43% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.183.133.50top 7% in New York; top 18% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.230.480.48bottom 22% in New York; bottom 17% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)38.940.345.8bottom 49% in New York; top 34% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)31.139.842.9top 34% in New York; top 31% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.98, RN 0.46, weekend 3.60. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Other

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Adams, DanielIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE03/20/2019
Adams, DanielIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/20/2019
Bourg, RobertIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2001
Bourg, RobertIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2001
Brown, KevinIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/27/2023
Brown, KevinIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/27/2023
Burke, PatrickIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE09/21/2022
Burke, PatrickIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/21/2022
Hayes, JohnIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE03/28/2018
Hayes, JohnIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/28/2018
Indiano, CarmenIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE03/29/2017
Indiano, CarmenIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/29/2017
Kuhn, KariIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/10/2025
Kuhn, KariIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/10/2025
Lynch, AnnaIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE03/24/2015
Lynch, AnnaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/25/2015
Marro, NicoleIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE04/24/2024
Marro, NicoleIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/24/2024
McRae, MichaelIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/07/2010
McRae, MichaelIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/07/2010

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
The Pearl Nursing Center of Rochester0.2 miRochester, NY★☆☆☆☆1/5
The Brook at High Falls Nursing Home and Rehabilit1.7 miRochester, NY★★☆☆☆2/5
Lilac Manor Rehabilitation and Nursing Center2.7 miRochester, NY★☆☆☆☆1/5
Kirkhaven2.9 miRochester, NY★☆☆☆☆1/5
Blossom Health Care Center INC.3.6 miRochester, NY★☆☆☆☆2/5
Church Home of the Protestant Episcopal Church4.0 miRochester, NY★★★☆☆3/5
Unity Living Center4.1 miRochester, NY★★★☆☆2/5
St. John's Health Care Corporation4.6 miRochester, NY★☆☆☆☆1/5
The Brightonian, INC4.7 miRochester, NY★★★★★5/5
The Friendly Home5.4 miRochester, NY★★★★☆3/5
The Highlands at Brighton5.7 miRochester, NY★★★☆☆3/5
Woodside Manor Nursing Home INC5.7 miRochester, NY★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Rochester →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335081.