Rhode IslandGreenville

Stillwater Assisted Living and Skilled Nursing Com

20 Austin Avenue, Greenville, RI 02828 · Providence County · 80 certified beds · avg 75 residents/day · certified since Aug 7, 1997

Part of chain: EDEN HEALTHCARE (7 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.44
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Feb 20, 2023 · F-0880

The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Why it matters: Weak infection control lets illnesses like flu, COVID-19, and drug-resistant infections spread quickly among vulnerable residents.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Feb 20, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (22)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 3, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Mar 19, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Mar 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Mar 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them.
Mar 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Apr 11, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Sep 1, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Aug 31, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · from a complaint
Aug 31, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · from a complaint
Feb 20, 2023▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 20, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 20, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Feb 20, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them.
Feb 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Feb 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Feb 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023101K ▲
202460F
202550F
202610E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityRhode Island avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.443.883.95bottom 35% in Rhode Island; bottom 33% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.720.800.69bottom 44% in Rhode Island; top 35% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.013.483.50bottom 26% in Rhode Island; bottom 31% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.390.550.48bottom 26% in Rhode Island; top 50% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)36.940.645.8top 40% in Rhode Island; top 29% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)50.037.942.9bottom 29% in Rhode Island; bottom 39% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.45, RN 0.72, weekend 3.03. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Cortland Place Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%12/04/2019
Fogel, JoshuaIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/18/2018
Gellis, LouisIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/18/2018
Weiss, MosheIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/18/2018
Weiss, NaftaliIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/18/2018
WF Cortland LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/18/2018
Eden Healthcare LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/04/2019
Gellis, LouisIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/18/2018
Misto, SusanIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE12/04/2019

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Greenville Operations Ri LLC DBA Greenville Skille1.1 miGreenville, RI★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Cedar Haven Operations LLC DBA Lake Forrest Health2.4 miSmithfield, RI★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Heritage Hills Nursing & Rehabilitation Center4.4 miSmithfield, RI★★☆☆☆1/5
Lincolnwood Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center4.5 miNorth Providence, RI★★☆☆☆2/5
Cherry Hill Manor4.7 miJohnston, RI★★★★★5/5
Briarcliffe Manor4.7 miJohnston, RI★★★★★5/5
Golden Crest Nursing Centre5.7 miNorth Providence, RI★★★★☆4/5
Morgan Health Center6.6 miJohnston, RI★★★☆☆2/5
Elmhurst Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center6.8 miProvidence, RI★★☆☆☆2/5
Berkshire Place7.0 miProvidence, RI★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Holiday Operator, LLC DBA Holiday Rehabilitation a7.2 miManville, RI★★☆☆☆2/5
Crystal Lake Rehabilitation and Care Center7.7 miPascoag, RI★☆☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Greenville →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 415123.