Rhode IslandSmithfield

Cedar Haven Operations LLC DBA Lake Forrest Health

180 Log Road, Smithfield, RI 02917 · Providence County · 133 certified beds · avg 97 residents/day · certified since Nov 1, 1977

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
5
Serious findings on record
$112,473
Fines, last 3 years
3.81
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Nov 25, 2025 · F-0726 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.

Why it matters: Undertrained caregivers are more likely to miss warning signs and make care mistakes.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Dec 23, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Nov 25, 2025 · F-0760 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.

Why it matters: A serious medication error can cause real harm, hospitalization, or worse.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Dec 23, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jul 17, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jul 24, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jun 24, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jul 24, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, repeated · Jun 4, 2024 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (H): Multiple residents were actually harmed by the same failure — a pattern of real harm, not an isolated incident.

Corrected: Jul 4, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (42)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 25, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Jan 2, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 2, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jan 2, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop, carry out, or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
Jan 2, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Jan 2, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jan 2, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jan 2, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Jan 2, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Jan 2, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Dec 1, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Dec 1, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Nov 25, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint
Nov 25, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Nov 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Mar 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Mar 11, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Dec 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Dec 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Oct 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Oct 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Oct 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Oct 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Aug 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jul 22, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Jul 22, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · from a complaint
Jul 17, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jun 24, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jun 24, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · from a complaint
Jun 4, 2024▲ H · Actual harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
May 1, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint
Oct 19, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Oct 19, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Oct 19, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 19, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Oct 19, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Oct 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Oct 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Oct 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or obtain laboratory tests when a doctor ordered them, or did not promptly report the results back to the doctor who ordered them.
Sep 7, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Aug 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 9).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023100F
2024153J ▲
202572J ▲
2026100F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

3 fines totaling $112,473, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Nov 25, 2025Fine$14,901
May 1, 2024Fine$89,642
May 1, 2024Payment Denial50 days from Jul 18, 2024
Aug 23, 2023Fine$7,930

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityRhode Island avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.813.883.95top 41% in Rhode Island; top 48% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.860.800.69top 38% in Rhode Island; top 23% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.473.483.50top 39% in Rhode Island; top 43% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.420.550.48bottom 33% in Rhode Island; top 44% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)46.940.645.8bottom 23% in Rhode Island; bottom 45% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)35.737.942.9bottom 48% in Rhode Island; top 39% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.26, RN 0.74, weekend 2.98. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Individual

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Esri Holdco LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest20%06/01/2025
Lake Valley Operations Holdco LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%06/01/2025
Yarmush, YehudaIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest80%06/01/2025
Aponte, SandraIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2025
Bibeault, PamelaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2025
Brand Sonnenschine LLPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2025
Centralized Business Services LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
Derienzo, RichardIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2025
Esri Holdco LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2025
Heller, ShlomoIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2025
Lake Forest Health & Rehabilitation Propco LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2025
Lake Valley Operations Holdco LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2025
Lake Valley Realty Holdco LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2025
Lake Valley Ri Management LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2025
Lake Valley Ri Management LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2025
Majekodunmi, AkindeleIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2025
Majekodunmi, AkindeleIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/08/2025
McAlpine, UlyssesIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2025
McAlpine, UlyssesIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2025
Nussbaum, EphraimIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Stillwater Assisted Living and Skilled Nursing Com2.4 miGreenville, RI★★★★☆4/5
Greenville Operations Ri LLC DBA Greenville Skille2.5 miGreenville, RI★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Heritage Hills Nursing & Rehabilitation Center4.8 miSmithfield, RI★★☆☆☆1/5
Holiday Operator, LLC DBA Holiday Rehabilitation a5.2 miManville, RI★★☆☆☆2/5
Lincolnwood Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center5.3 miNorth Providence, RI★★☆☆☆2/5
Cherry Hill Manor6.3 miJohnston, RI★★★★★5/5
Cedar Haven Operations Holding LLC Valley View Hea6.4 miWoonsocket, RI★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Golden Crest Nursing Centre6.5 miNorth Providence, RI★★★★☆4/5
St Antoine Residence6.5 miNorth Smithfield, RI★★★★☆3/5
The Friendly Home6.6 miWoonsocket, RI★☆☆☆☆1/5
Adviniacare Oakland Grove LLC6.8 miWoonsocket, RI★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Briarcliffe Manor6.8 miJohnston, RI★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Smithfield →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 415049.