Rhode Island ›North Providence
100 Smithfield Road, North Providence, RI 02904 (opens Google Maps) · Providence County · (401) 353-1710· 152 certified beds · avg 144 residents/day · certified since Oct 17, 1969 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Dec 11, 2025 · F-0686
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jan 10, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, pattern · Oct 13, 2023 · F-0600
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (H): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was a pattern: more than a limited occurrence, without being widespread. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Oct 26, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 27 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · from a complaint F-0692
The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint F-0842
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. F-0686
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · from a complaint · F-0692 |
| Apr 16, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Dec 11, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Dec 11, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Dec 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Dec 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
| Dec 19, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Nov 4, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint · F-0761 |
| Sep 20, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Sep 20, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Sep 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Sep 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Sep 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Sep 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Sep 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Jul 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| May 9, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint · F-0658 |
| May 9, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Oct 13, 2023 | ▲ H · Actual harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · F-0600 |
| Oct 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Oct 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Oct 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint · F-0686 |
| Oct 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Oct 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for residents with a colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy — surgical openings in the abdomen that let waste leave the body into a pouch. These require regular, skilled attention to stay clean and healthy. · F-0691 |
| Oct 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Oct 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Oct 13, 2023 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 4).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 9 | 1 | H ▲ |
| 2024 | 12 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 4 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 2 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
2 fines totaling $70,868.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2025 | Fine | $30,360 |
| Oct 13, 2023 | Fine | $40,508 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Rhode Island avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.09 | 3.88 | 3.95 | top 32% in Rhode Island; top 36% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.51 | 0.80 | 0.69 | bottom 16% in Rhode Island; bottom 40% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.77 | 3.48 | 3.50 | top 28% in Rhode Island; top 30% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.28 | 0.55 | 0.48 | bottom 10% in Rhode Island; bottom 29% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 45.2 | 40.6 | 45.8 | bottom 26% in Rhode Island; bottom 49% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 41.2 | 37.9 | 42.9 | bottom 37% in Rhode Island; top 49% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.73, RN 0.47, weekend 3.44.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.73 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Golden Crest Nursing Centre. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hickey, Raymond | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2012 |
| Nichols, Michelle | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2012 |
| Pezzelli Whipple, Susan | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2012 |
| Pezzelli, Lisa | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2012 |
| Pezzelli, Paul | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 40% | 06/02/2023 |
| Hickey, Raymond | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/03/2025 |
| Majekodunmi, Akindele | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2020 |
| Majekodunmi, Akindele | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2020 |
| Nichols, Michelle | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/03/2025 |
| Pezzelli Whipple, Susan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/03/2025 |
| Pezzelli, Lisa | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/03/2025 |
| Pezzelli, Paul | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/02/2023 |
| Pezzelli, Paul | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/02/2023 |
| Pezzelli, Paul | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/02/2023 |
| Pezzelli, Paul | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/02/2023 |
| Pezzelli, Paul | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/02/2023 |
All 16 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lincolnwood Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 1.2 mi | North Providence, RI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Berkshire Place | 1.4 mi | Providence, RI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Elmhurst Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 1.5 mi | Providence, RI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Heritage Hills Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 1.8 mi | Smithfield, RI | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Cherry Hill Manor | 2.2 mi | Johnston, RI | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Jeanne Jugan Residence | 2.6 mi | Pawtucket, RI | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Adviniacare Summit Commons, LLC | 2.8 mi | Providence, RI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Adviniacare Providence Dodge Rehab Center, LLC | 3.2 mi | Providence, RI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Adviniacare Pawtucket Pleasant Rehab Center, LLC | 3.4 mi | Pawtucket, RI | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Steere House Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 3.5 mi | Providence, RI | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Mansion Nursing and Rehab Center | 3.6 mi | Central Falls, RI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Elmwood Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 3.6 mi | Providence, RI | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Providence, RI — 41 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 415029.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details