How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
920 Cherry Ridge Boulevard, Webster, NY 14580 (opens Google Maps) · Monroe County · (585) 697-6800· 72 certified beds · avg 71 residents/day · certified since Mar 20, 1992 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 11 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. F-0761
The facility did not properly run its feeding assistant program — assessing which residents are appropriate for it, following each resident's care plan, and making sure feeding assistants are trained and supervised. Feeding assistants are trained helpers who assist residents at mealtimes. F-0811
The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. F-0655
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Sep 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly run its feeding assistant program — assessing which residents are appropriate for it, following each resident's care plan, and making sure feeding assistants are trained and supervised. Feeding assistants are trained helpers who assist residents at mealtimes. · F-0811 |
| May 8, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| May 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| May 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint · F-0760 |
| May 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Sep 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Aug 29, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · F-0607 |
| Aug 29, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Aug 29, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Aug 29, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 2).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 2 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New York avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.86 | 3.58 | 3.95 | top 7% in New York; top 16% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.69 | top 37% in New York; top 41% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.50 | 3.13 | 3.50 | top 4% in New York; top 12% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.39 | 0.48 | 0.48 | top 42% in New York; top 49% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 37.5 | 40.3 | 45.8 | top 48% in New York; top 30% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 25.0 | 39.8 | 42.9 | top 19% in New York; top 20% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.18, RN 0.56, weekend 3.87.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.18 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for St. Ann's Community. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adams, Daniel | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/20/2019 |
| Adams, Daniel | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/20/2019 |
| Barnes, Rene | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/22/2016 |
| Barnes, Rene | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/22/2016 |
| Bourg, Robert | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2010 |
| Bourg, Robert | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2010 |
| Brown, Kevin | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/27/2023 |
| Brown, Kevin | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/27/2023 |
| Burke, Patrick | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/21/2022 |
| Burke, Patrick | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/21/2022 |
| Hayes, John | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/28/2018 |
| Hayes, John | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/28/2018 |
| Indiano, Carmen | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/29/2017 |
| Indiano, Carmen | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/29/2017 |
| Lynch, Anna | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/25/2018 |
| Lynch, Anna | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/25/2015 |
| Marro, Nicole | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/24/2024 |
| Marro, Nicole | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/24/2024 |
| McRae, Michael | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/07/2010 |
| McRae, Michael | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2010 |
Showing 20 of 55 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 35 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maplewood Nursing Home INC | 1.8 mi | Webster, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Penfield Place | 5.5 mi | Penfield, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Blossom Health Care Center INC. | 5.6 mi | Rochester, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| St. Ann's Community | 5.8 mi | Rochester, NY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| The Pearl Nursing Center of Rochester | 5.9 mi | Rochester, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| The Friendly Home | 6.4 mi | Rochester, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Lilac Manor Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 7.0 mi | Rochester, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Fairport Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 7.0 mi | Fairport, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Kirkhaven | 7.5 mi | Rochester, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| The Brook at High Falls Nursing Home and Rehabilit | 7.5 mi | Rochester, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Brightonian, INC | 8.2 mi | Rochester, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Highlands Living Center | 8.6 mi | Pittsford, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Monroe, NY — 32 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335730.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details