How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Springs at Lafayette, the
2402 South Street, Lafayette, IN 47904 (opens Google Maps) · Tippecanoe County · (765) 446-9229· 70 certified beds · avg 49 residents/day · certified since Mar 24, 2015 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES (123 facilities, chain avg rating 4.2★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Sep 24, 2025
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Jun 18, 2024
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.06
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jun 18, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jun 18, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jun 5, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 14 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. F-0580
The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). F-0628
The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. F-0644
View all 14 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580 |
| Sep 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · F-0628 |
| Sep 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| Sep 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Sep 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580 |
| Sep 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Sep 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jun 18, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Jul 19, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Jul 19, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610 |
| Jul 19, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · F-0676 |
| Jul 19, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Jul 19, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jul 19, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 4).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2025
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 4 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 4 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityIndiana averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.06
Indiana average: 3.42
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.86
Indiana average: 0.62
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.59
Indiana average: 3.01
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Indiana avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.06 | 3.42 | 3.95 | bottom 33% in Indiana; bottom 16% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.86 | 0.62 | 0.69 | top 16% in Indiana; top 23% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.59 | 3.01 | 3.50 | bottom 24% in Indiana; bottom 12% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.70 | 0.47 | 0.48 | top 14% in Indiana; top 16% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 52.5 | 45.9 | 45.8 | bottom 29% in Indiana; bottom 31% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 27.3 | 40.4 | 42.9 | top 26% in Indiana; top 24% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.52, RN 0.99, weekend 2.99.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.52 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Springs at Lafayette, the. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Witham Memorial Hospital | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 07/01/2015 |
| American Healthcare Reit Holdings LP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2015 |
| American Healthcare Reit INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2018 |
| Bardoczi, Stephen | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/03/2013 |
| Barney, Leigh | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/10/2025 |
| Bayston, Brett | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Brand, John | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2015 |
| Braverman, Kelly | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2021 |
| Castetter, Andrea | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Continental Merger Sub LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2021 |
| Davis, David | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/10/2025 |
| Gahc3 Trilogy JV LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2015 |
| Gahc4 Trilogy JV LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2018 |
| Hawkins, Claude | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/09/2013 |
| Hornbecker, Michael | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Paragon Outpatient Rehabilitation Services LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2015 |
| Reagan, Julie | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/25/2024 |
| RHS Partners of Lafayette LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2015 |
| RHS Partners of Lafayette LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/15/2025 |
| Sellers, Daniel | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/20/2024 |
Showing 20 of 30 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 10 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Trilogy Health Services — 123 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Springs of Mooresville, the — Mooresville, IN · overall 5/5
- Springs of Richmond, the — Richmond, IN · overall 3/5
- St Andrews Health Campus — Batesville, IN · overall 4/5
- St Charles Health Campus — Jasper, IN · overall 5/5
- St Elizabeth Healthcare Center — Delphi, IN · overall 4/5
- St Mary Healthcare Center — Lafayette, IN · overall 3/5
- Stonebridge Health Campus — Bedford, IN · overall 5/5
- Stonecroft Health Campus — Bloomington, IN · overall 5/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 122 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
- "What written notices do we get before any transfer or discharge, and what is your bed-hold policy?"
- "How do you identify and arrange specialized services for residents with mental health conditions or disabilities?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "Can you give me examples of how you adjust daily routines and room setups to fit each resident's preferences?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Indiana midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 53% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 30 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 13 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| St Mary Healthcare Center | 0.3 mi | Lafayette, IN | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Rosewalk Village at Lafayette | 0.6 mi | Lafayette, IN | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Saint Anthony Rehab and Nursing Center | 1.0 mi | Lafayette, IN | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Majestic Care of Lafayette | 2.2 mi | Lafayette, IN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Creasy Springs Health Campus | 2.4 mi | Lafayette, IN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Westminster Village - West Lafayette | 3.7 mi | West Lafayette, IN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Heritage Healthcare | 3.8 mi | West Lafayette, IN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Indiana Veterans Home | 3.9 mi | West Lafayette, IN | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Cumberland Pointe Health Campus | 4.0 mi | West Lafayette, IN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| University Place Health Center and Assisted Living | 4.0 mi | West Lafayette, IN | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Mulberry Health & Rehabilitation Center | 11.5 mi | Mulberry, IN | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Milner Community Health Care | 15.0 mi | Rossville, IN | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 155829.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).