University Place Health Center and Assisted Living

Name: University Place Health Center and Assisted Living
Address: 1750 LINDBERG RD, West Lafayette, IN, 47906, US
Telephone: 7654645600

1750 Lindberg Rd, West Lafayette, IN 47906 · Tippecanoe County · 30 certified beds · avg 27 residents/day · certified since Jan 5, 2004

Part of chain: FRANCISCAN COMMUNITIES (6 facilities, chain avg rating 4.0★)

3/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

7.32

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 31, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

All citations in the current public record (20)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Mar 31, 2026	▲ G · Actual harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Nov 25, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Nov 25, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Nov 25, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Nov 25, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Nov 25, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Nov 25, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Nov 25, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Nov 25, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Nov 25, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Nov 25, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Dec 1, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Dec 1, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Dec 1, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Dec 1, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Dec 1, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Dec 1, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Dec 1, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Dec 1, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Dec 1, 2023	C · Minimal risk, facility-wide	The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 3).

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2023	9	0	E
2024	7	0	D
2025	3	0	D
2026	1	1	G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Indiana avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	7.32	3.42	3.95	top 1% in Indiana; top 1% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	2.07	0.62	0.69	top 1% in Indiana; top 2% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	6.95	3.01	3.50	top 1% in Indiana; top 1% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	1.69	0.47	0.48	top 1% in Indiana; top 1% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	39.3	45.9	45.8	top 31% in Indiana; top 35% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	0.0	40.4	42.9	top 1% in Indiana; top 1% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 7.02, RN 1.98, weekend 6.67. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Church related

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Franciscan Sisters of Chicago Services Corporation	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	100%	10/15/1998
University Place INC	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	100%	10/15/1998
Dodt, Keven	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	04/01/2022
Dodt, Keven	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	04/01/2022
Franciscan Sisters of Chicago Services Corporation	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	03/30/2001
High, Amanda	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	02/01/2022
High, Amanda	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	02/01/2022
Kinder, David	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	02/29/2016
Kinder, David	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	02/29/2016
Rosenberger, Robert	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	04/11/2023
Rosenberger, Robert	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	04/11/2023
Shearer, Tracy	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	09/21/2002
Stark, James	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	02/19/2014
Stark, James	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	05/31/2016
Umanskiy, Regina	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	07/05/2022
Umanskiy, Regina	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	07/05/2022
University Place INC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	10/15/1998
University Place INC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	07/10/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"How do you identify and arrange specialized services for residents with mental health conditions or disabilities?"
"How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
"How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
"Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
"How do you monitor residents' weight and eating, and what happens when someone starts losing weight?"
"What alternatives do you try before using bed rails, and how do you involve families in that decision?"
"What is your approach to psychiatric medications — how do you try non-drug options first and work to reduce doses over time?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection
Cumberland Pointe Health Campus	1.3 mi	West Lafayette, IN	★★★☆☆	2/5
Westminster Village - West Lafayette	1.4 mi	West Lafayette, IN	★★★☆☆	2/5
Heritage Healthcare	2.4 mi	West Lafayette, IN	★★★☆☆	2/5
Saint Anthony Rehab and Nursing Center	3.1 mi	Lafayette, IN	★★★★☆	4/5
Indiana Veterans Home	3.4 mi	West Lafayette, IN	★★★★☆	4/5
Rosewalk Village at Lafayette	3.5 mi	Lafayette, IN	★★★☆☆	3/5
St Mary Healthcare Center	3.8 mi	Lafayette, IN	★★★☆☆	3/5
Majestic Care of Lafayette	3.9 mi	Lafayette, IN	★☆☆☆☆	2/5
Springs at Lafayette, the	4.0 mi	Lafayette, IN	★★★★★	4/5
Creasy Springs Health Campus	6.4 mi	Lafayette, IN	★★★☆☆	2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in West Lafayette →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 155725.

The Care File

Visit checklist — University Place Health Center and Assisted Living

1750 Lindberg Rd, West Lafayette, IN 47906 · 7654645600

Health inspection rating 3/5 · CMS overall 4/5· Fines (3y): $0

Most serious findings on record:

▲ Mar 31, 2026 (F-0689, Actual harm, one-off): The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
☐ "How do you identify and arrange specialized services for residents with mental health conditions or disabilities?"
☐ "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
☐ "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
☐ "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
☐ "How do you monitor residents' weight and eating, and what happens when someone starts losing weight?"
☐ "What alternatives do you try before using bed rails, and how do you involve families in that decision?"
☐ "What is your approach to psychiatric medications — how do you try non-drug options first and work to reduce doses over time?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 155725 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)