Eastwood Manor
6th and Highway 69, Commerce, OK 74339 · Ottawa County · 80 certified beds · avg 37 residents/day · certified since Jul 25, 2008
Part of chain: OKLAHOMA NURSING HOMES, LTD. (7 facilities, chain avg rating 2.6★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$31,815
Fines, last 3 years
0.00
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
All citations in the current public record (23)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Feb 27, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Feb 27, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. |
| Feb 27, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Feb 27, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Feb 27, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. |
| Feb 27, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. |
| Dec 19, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. |
| Dec 19, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Dec 19, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. |
| Dec 19, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. |
| Dec 19, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. |
| Dec 19, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| Dec 19, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. |
| Dec 19, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Dec 19, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not regularly inspect bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails for safety, or the rails and mattresses were not attached safely to the frames. |
| Mar 9, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies. |
| Mar 9, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. |
| Mar 9, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| Mar 9, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. |
| Mar 9, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. |
| Mar 9, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not regularly inspect bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails for safety, or the rails and mattresses were not attached safely to the frames. |
| Mar 9, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (9 → 7).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 16 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 7 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
7 fines totaling $31,815.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2023 | Fine | $4,545 |
| Sep 25, 2023 | Fine | $4,545 |
| Sep 18, 2023 | Fine | $4,545 |
| Sep 11, 2023 | Fine | $4,545 |
| Sep 5, 2023 | Fine | $4,545 |
| Aug 28, 2023 | Fine | $4,545 |
| Aug 21, 2023 | Fine | $4,545 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Oklahoma avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 0.00 | 4.58 | 3.95 | — |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.00 | 0.41 | 0.69 | — |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 0.00 | 4.16 | 3.50 | — |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.00 | 0.28 | 0.48 | — |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 0.0 | 55.5 | 45.8 | — |
| RN turnover (%) | 0.0 | 53.6 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 0.00, RN 0.00, weekend 0.00. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Individual
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cheek, Barnie | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 8% | 01/11/2005 |
| Estep, Patsy | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 6% | 01/01/2023 |
| Haskins, Lloyd | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 01/11/2005 |
| McGrew, Justin | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 6% | 08/08/2005 |
| Sandra Cheek Farmer Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 8% | 01/11/2005 |
| Steven R. Tubbs Revocable Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 14% | 01/01/2023 |
| Carolyn D Leaverton Revocable Trust | Organization | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Coxort, Pamela | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| McGrew, Justin | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| McGrew, Justin | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Sandra Cheek Farmer Trust | Organization | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Steven R. Tubbs Revocable Trust | Organization | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "What is your approach to psychiatric medications — how do you try non-drug options first and work to reduce doses over time?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "How soon after admission is a full assessment completed, and how are the findings shared with the family?"
- "What does the care plan for a brand-new resident cover in the first 48 hours, and who writes it?"
- "How do you verify that your nurses and aides have the skills to care for residents with needs like my family member's?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Windridge Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 1.8 mi | Miami, OK | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Miami Nursing Center, LLC | 4.6 mi | Miami, OK | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Higher Call Nursing Center | 4.9 mi | Quapaw, OK | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Quaker Hill Manor | 12.5 mi | Baxter Springs, KS | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Maple Healthcare and Rehab | 12.5 mi | Fairland, OK | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Seneca Nursing | 15.3 mi | Seneca, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Medicalodges Columbus | 16.5 mi | Columbus, KS | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Galena Nursing & Rehab Center | 16.6 mi | Galena, KS | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Communities of Wildwood Ranch | 17.9 mi | Joplin, MO | ★★★★☆ | 5/5 | |
| Westgate | 17.9 mi | Joplin, MO | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 375529.