OklahomaBlanchard

Senior Village Healthcare

1104 North Madison, Blanchard, OK 73010 · Mcclain County · 50 certified beds · avg 45 residents/day · certified since Nov 8, 2019

Part of chain: BRIDGES HEALTH (33 facilities, chain avg rating 3.6★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.31
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (16)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Aug 1, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Aug 1, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Aug 1, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Aug 1, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Aug 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Apr 26, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Apr 26, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Apr 26, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs.
Apr 26, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 26, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
Apr 26, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Apr 26, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Apr 26, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Apr 26, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offWhen a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care.
Apr 26, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Apr 26, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.

Inspection trend by year

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2022110E
202450E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityOklahoma avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.314.583.95bottom 37% in Oklahoma; top 29% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.740.410.69top 7% in Oklahoma; top 33% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.084.163.50bottom 49% in Oklahoma; top 20% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.270.280.48top 41% in Oklahoma; bottom 26% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)26.755.545.8top 1% in Oklahoma; top 9% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)16.753.642.9top 8% in Oklahoma; top 9% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.44, RN 0.59, weekend 3.26. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Partnership

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Bridges Employee Stock Ownership TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest100%12/31/2020
Bridges Esop, INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2020
Coble, WilliamIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2020
Coble, WilliamIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2020
Deroin, KristyIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE10/14/1972

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Grace Skilled and Nursing Therapy Norman9.9 miNorman, OK★★★★★5/5
Medical Park West Rehabilitation & Skilled Care10.5 miNorman, OK★☆☆☆☆1/5
Ignite Medical Resort Norman, LLC11.2 miNorman, OK★☆☆☆☆2/5
24th Place11.3 miNorman, OK★☆☆☆☆1/5
Tuttle Care Center12.9 miTuttle, OK★★☆☆☆4/5
Holiday Heights Healthcare13.7 miNorman, OK★★★★★5/5
Noble Health Care Center15.4 miNoble, OK★☆☆☆☆1/5
Meadowlake Estates16.3 miOklahoma City, OK★☆☆☆☆1/5
Thunder Care and Rehabilitation17.4 miMoore, OK★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Brookwood Skilled Nursing and Therapy17.8 miOklahoma City, OK★☆☆☆☆1/5
Chickasha Nursing Center, INC18.1 miChickasha, OK★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Shanoan Springs Nursing and Rehabilitation18.2 miChickasha, OK★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Blanchard →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 375577.