OklahomaEnid

The Commons

301 South Oakwood Road, Enid, OK 73706 · Garfield County · 138 certified beds · avg 91 residents/day · certified since Feb 9, 2005

Part of chain: BRIDGES HEALTH (33 facilities, chain avg rating 3.6★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$3,174
Fines, last 3 years
4.47
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (20)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 5, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jun 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Jun 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Jun 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Jun 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Jun 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have enough support staff to safely and effectively run its food and nutrition service.
Jun 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 5, 2026C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Oct 31, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records.
Oct 31, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Oct 31, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Sep 15, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Sep 15, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Sep 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint
Sep 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Sep 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Sep 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Sep 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows.
Sep 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 8).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202390E
202430F
202680E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $3,174.

DateTypeAmount / length
Nov 6, 2023Fine$3,174

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityOklahoma avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.474.583.95bottom 45% in Oklahoma; top 24% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.320.410.69bottom 35% in Oklahoma; bottom 12% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.944.163.50bottom 37% in Oklahoma; top 25% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.170.280.48bottom 19% in Oklahoma; bottom 8% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)53.755.545.8top 45% in Oklahoma; bottom 28% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)37.553.642.9top 27% in Oklahoma; top 42% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.55, RN 0.25, weekend 3.13. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Bridges Employee Stock Ownership TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest100%12/31/2024
Bridges Esop, INCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2024
Amity Care, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2024
Amity Care, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/05/2025
Barker, JenniferIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2024
Barker, JenniferIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2024
Barker, JenniferIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2024
Bridges Esop, INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2024
Coble, WilliamIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2024
Coble, WilliamIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2024
Commons Real Estate, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2024
Deroin, KristyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2024
Deroin, KristyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2024
Duncan, RobertIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2024
Duncan, RobertIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2024
Griffin, WilliamIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2024
Liberty National BankOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2024
Long, DennisIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2024
Washburn, DanielIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2024
Wood, JoshuaIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Garland Road Nursing & Rehab Center1.4 miEnid, OK★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Greenbrier Village Health and Rehabilitation3.5 miEnid, OK★★☆☆☆3/5
Baptist Village of Enid3.9 miEnid, OK★★★☆☆3/5
The Living Center4.1 miEnid, OK★★★★★5/5
Enid Senior Care5.0 miEnid, OK★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Enid →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 375488.