Meadowlake Estates

Name: Meadowlake Estates
Address: 959 SOUTHWEST 107TH STREET, Oklahoma City, OK, 73139, US
Telephone: 4057033400

959 Southwest 107th Street, Oklahoma City, OK 73139 · Cleveland County · 124 certified beds · avg 112 residents/day · certified since Apr 26, 1996 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: STONEGATE SENIOR LIVING (24 facilities, chain avg rating 2.4★)

1/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

$23,611

Fines, last 3 years

3.89

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jan 6, 2025 · F-0803 · triggered by a complaint

The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.

Why it matters: When menus aren't planned and followed properly, residents may not get the nutrition their health depends on.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Feb 5, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Sep 15, 2023 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Oct 12, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (33)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Apr 1, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Mar 12, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Mar 12, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Jan 6, 2025	▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off	The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · from a complaint
Jan 6, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 6, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Jan 6, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Jan 6, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jan 6, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint
Jan 6, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jan 6, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jan 6, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Feb 16, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	When a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care. · from a complaint
Feb 16, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Feb 16, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not serve meals and snacks at times that fit residents' needs, preferences, and requests, or did not offer nourishing alternatives for residents who want to eat outside scheduled meal times. · from a complaint
Feb 16, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · from a complaint
Feb 16, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility required residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits or pay privately as a condition of moving in, or failed to tell residents which types of care it does not provide. Both practices are against the rules. · from a complaint
Feb 16, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · from a complaint
Nov 30, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Nov 30, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Nov 30, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Nov 30, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Nov 30, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Sep 15, 2023	▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Dec 13, 2022	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Dec 13, 2022	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide the social services residents need — such as counseling, help with adjustment, or connecting to outside resources — to achieve the best possible quality of life.
Dec 13, 2022	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 13, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Dec 13, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Dec 13, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Dec 13, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Dec 13, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not serve meals and snacks at times that fit residents' needs, preferences, and requests, or did not offer nourishing alternatives for residents who want to eat outside scheduled meal times.
Dec 13, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 8).

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2022	9	0	E
2023	6	1	K ▲
2024	6	0	E
2025	11	1	J ▲
2026	1	0	D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $23,611.

Date	Type	Amount / length
Jan 6, 2025	Fine	$12,441
Sep 15, 2023	Fine	$11,170

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Oklahoma avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.89	4.58	3.95	bottom 15% in Oklahoma; top 44% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.32	0.41	0.69	bottom 35% in Oklahoma; bottom 12% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	3.33	4.16	3.50	bottom 10% in Oklahoma; bottom 49% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.27	0.28	0.48	top 39% in Oklahoma; bottom 27% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	59.3	55.5	45.8	bottom 38% in Oklahoma; bottom 17% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	33.3	53.6	42.9	top 20% in Oklahoma; top 33% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.37, RN 0.28, weekend 2.89. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
PF Mle SNF Ops, LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	—	11/01/2020
Preservation Freehold Company	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	100%	10/10/2019
Sanctuary LTC, LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	—	10/10/2019
Campbell, Scott	Individual	Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/12/2025
Chance, James	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	11/01/2020
Fisher, James	Individual	Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/12/2025
Hardy, David	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	02/10/2025
Hardy, David	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	02/10/2025
Langdon, Thomas	Individual	Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	11/21/2025
Lifetime Wellness, LTD.	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	09/23/2021
Martus Financial Services, INC.	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/31/2023
McGehee, William	Individual	Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	11/21/2025
PF Mle SNF Ops, LLC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	11/01/2020
Pharmerica Drug Systems LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	08/29/2017
Preservation Freehold Company	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	09/23/2021
Raju, Senthil	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2018
Rehab Pro LP	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	09/23/2021
Sanctuary LTC, LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	09/23/2021
Stonegate Senior Living, LP	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	06/22/2022
Stonegate Senior Living, LP	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	11/24/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"Who reviews your menus, and can I see this week's menu and join my family member for a meal?"
"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
"How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
"How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
"How soon after admission is a full assessment completed, and how are the findings shared with the family?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Brookwood Skilled Nursing and Therapy	1.6 mi	Oklahoma City, OK	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Accel at Crystal Park	2.1 mi	Oklahoma City, OK	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Thunder Care and Rehabilitation	2.3 mi	Moore, OK	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	abuse
Emerald Care Center Southwest LLC	3.5 mi	Oklahoma City, OK	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Capitol Hill Skilled Nursing and Therapy	3.7 mi	Oklahoma City, OK	★★★☆☆	3/5
South Pointe Rehabilitation and Care Center	3.8 mi	Oklahoma City, OK	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	SFF
South Park East	4.9 mi	Oklahoma City, OK	★★☆☆☆	1/5	abuse
Mid-Del Skilled Nursing and Therapy	8.3 mi	Del City, OK	★★★★☆	4/5
Fairmont Skilled Nursing and Therapy	8.5 mi	Oklahoma City, OK	★★☆☆☆	2/5	abuse
Medical Park West Rehabilitation & Skilled Care	9.1 mi	Norman, OK	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Cross Timbers Nursing and Rehabilitation	9.1 mi	Midwest City, OK	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Ignite Medical Resort Norman, LLC	9.2 mi	Norman, OK	★☆☆☆☆	2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Oklahoma City →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 375256.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Meadowlake Estates

959 Southwest 107th Street, Oklahoma City, OK 73139 · 4057033400

Health inspection rating 1/5 · CMS overall 1/5· Fines (3y): $23,611

Most serious findings on record:

▲ Jan 6, 2025 (F-0803, Immediate jeopardy, one-off): The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
▲ Sep 15, 2023 (F-0689, Immediate jeopardy, repeated): The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "Who reviews your menus, and can I see this week's menu and join my family member for a meal?"
☐ "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
☐ "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
☐ "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
☐ "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
☐ "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
☐ "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
☐ "How soon after admission is a full assessment completed, and how are the findings shared with the family?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 375256 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)