88 Harbor Drive, Saco, ME 04072 (opens Google Maps) · York County · (207) 283-3646· 105 certified beds · avg 91 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1993 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: FIRST ATLANTIC HEALTHCARE (10 facilities, chain avg rating 3.4★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, pattern · Apr 2, 2025 · F-0880 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Why it matters: Weak infection control lets illnesses like flu, COVID-19, and drug-resistant infections spread quickly among vulnerable residents.
Severity (K): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was a pattern: more than a limited occurrence, without being widespread. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Apr 24, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 27 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. F-0578
The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. F-0602
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. F-0689
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Apr 3, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · F-0602 |
| Apr 3, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Apr 3, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention. · F-0947 |
| Apr 3, 2026 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Apr 2, 2025 | ▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Apr 2, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint · F-0726 |
| Apr 2, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · from a complaint · F-0835 |
| Apr 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580 |
| Apr 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Aug 8, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Aug 8, 2023 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint · F-0550 |
| Jul 27, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Jul 27, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| Jul 27, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jul 27, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Jul 27, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · F-0867 |
| Jul 27, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921 |
| Jul 27, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Jul 27, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Jul 27, 2022 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Jul 27, 2022 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625 |
| Jul 27, 2022 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
| Nov 7, 2019 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Nov 7, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · F-0552 |
| Nov 7, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561 |
| Nov 7, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' individual preferences, choices, values, and beliefs in their daily life and care. · F-0675 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (11 → 5).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2022 | 11 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 5 | 1 | K ▲ |
| 2026 | 5 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $75,433.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2025 | Fine | $75,433 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Maine avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.98 | 4.60 | 3.95 | top 30% in Maine; top 13% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.93 | 1.11 | 0.69 | bottom 37% in Maine; top 19% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.61 | 4.16 | 3.50 | top 23% in Maine; top 10% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.48 | bottom 49% in Maine; top 14% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 56.3 | 46.7 | 45.8 | bottom 18% in Maine; bottom 22% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 47.6 | 40.2 | 42.9 | bottom 34% in Maine; bottom 40% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.48, RN 0.84, weekend 4.14.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.48 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Seal Rock Healthcare. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faraday Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 67% | 06/29/2019 |
| KWB Holdings, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 33% | 06/29/2019 |
| Berman, Ari | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2024 |
| Berman, Ari | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2019 |
| Bowden, Kenneth | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/29/2019 |
| Bowden, Kenneth | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2019 |
| Coffin, Craig | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2019 |
| Faraday Holdings LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2019 |
| First Atlantic Healthcare INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/05/2005 |
| First Atlantic Healthcare INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/26/2025 |
| Gilbert, Jessica | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Gilbert, Jessica | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2023 |
| KWB Holdings, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2019 |
| Otis-Higgins, Andrea | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/11/2015 |
| Otis-Higgins, Andrea | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/11/2015 |
| Otis-Higgins, Andrea | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/11/2015 |
| Pelkey, Wanda | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2024 |
| Pelkey, Wanda | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2024 |
| Pelkey, Wanda | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2024 |
All 19 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain First Atlantic Healthcare — 10 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 9 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| St Andre Health Care Facility | 1.4 mi | Biddeford, ME | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Southridge Rehab & Living Ctr | 2.3 mi | Biddeford, ME | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Pine Point Center | 5.5 mi | Scarborough, ME | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Maine Veterans Home - Scarborough | 6.7 mi | Scarborough, ME | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Piper Shores | 8.1 mi | Scarborough, ME | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Kennebunk Center for Health & Rehabilitation, LLC | 9.3 mi | Kennebunk, ME | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| River Ridge Center | 9.8 mi | Kennebunk, ME | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Springbrook Center | 12.3 mi | Westbrook, ME | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Pinnacle Health & Rehab at South Portland | 12.5 mi | So Portland, ME | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Gorham House | 12.9 mi | Gorham, ME | ★★★★★ | 3/5 | |
| Barron Center | 13.4 mi | Portland, ME | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Seaside Healthcare LLC | 15.0 mi | Portland, ME | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in York, ME — 9 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 205103.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details