MaineSo Portland

Pinnacle Health & Rehab at South Portland

42 Anthoine St, So Portland, ME 04106 · Cumberland County · 73 certified beds · avg 66 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1993

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.41
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (25)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Sep 17, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Sep 17, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Sep 17, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Sep 17, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Sep 17, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Sep 17, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Sep 17, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Sep 17, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Sep 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Sep 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from.
Sep 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Jul 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · from a complaint
Jul 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Dec 8, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Dec 8, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Dec 8, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Dec 8, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 8, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Dec 8, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Dec 8, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Dec 8, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Dec 8, 2022B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Dec 5, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Dec 5, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (9 → 12).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201920D
202290E
202420D
2025120E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMaine avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.414.603.95bottom 45% in Maine; top 26% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.621.110.69bottom 5% in Maine; top 45% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.144.163.50top 42% in Maine; top 19% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.240.730.48bottom 1% in Maine; bottom 19% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)41.746.745.8top 33% in Maine; top 41% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)25.040.242.9top 22% in Maine; top 20% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.06, RN 0.57, weekend 3.81. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Nachfolger, IsraelIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest99%07/08/2019
Nachfolger, MiriamIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/08/2019
Anthoine St Realty LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2020
Berman, AriIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2024
Berman, AriIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/23/2025
Ketchum, JeffreyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2020
Ketchum, JeffreyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/23/2025
Nachfolger, IsraelIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2020
Nachfolger, IsraelIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2020
Nachfolger, IsraelIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/08/2019
Nachfolger, IsraelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2020
Nachfolger, MiriamIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2020
Nachfolger, MiriamIndividualGeneral Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/08/2019
Nachfolger, MiriamIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/08/2019
Nachfolger, MiriamIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2020

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Seaside Healthcare LLC3.3 miPortland, ME★★★★☆4/5
Cedars Nursing Care Center3.9 miPortland, ME★★★★☆4/5
Barron Center4.6 miPortland, ME★★★★☆4/5
Fallbrook Commons5.0 miPortland, ME★★★☆☆2/5
Piper Shores5.1 miScarborough, ME★★★★★4/5
Springbrook Center5.6 miWestbrook, ME★★☆☆☆1/5
Maine Veterans Home - Scarborough6.5 miScarborough, ME★★★★★5/5
Sedgewood Commons7.4 miFalmouth, ME★★★☆☆3/5
Pine Point Center7.5 miScarborough, ME★★☆☆☆2/5
Gorham House9.4 miGorham, ME★★★★★3/5
Brentwood Center for Health & Rehabilitation, LLC11.3 miYarmouth, ME★☆☆☆☆1/5
Coastal Manor12.3 miYarmouth, ME★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in So Portland →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 205121.